Department of Surgery, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Viale Oxford, 81, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Mar;15(1):31-7. doi: 10.1007/s10151-010-0658-0. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
Different trials have investigated the role of conventional anal manometry in the diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. The aim of the present study is to define the role and the effectiveness of vector anal manometry and vector asymmetry index scoring in the assessment of pelvic floor disorders i.e. fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation.
Between 2005 and 2007, 387 patients underwent clinical and manometric evaluation in the Department of Surgery, University Hospital Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy, and were included in the present prospective cohort study. All the patients underwent clinical examination, Wexner incontinence scoring, and anal vector manometry and were classified into three groups. Group I included patients with normal resting anal pressure values (195 patients). Groups II and III consisted of patients with resting anal pressure higher and lower than normal values, respectively (90 and 102 patients, respectively). All patients were classified into asymmetric and non-asymmetric according to the vector asymmetry index using a cut-off of 20%. We investigated the correlation between anal asymmetry and pelvic floor disorders, i.e. fecal incontinence due to sphincter injury, rectal prolapse, and obstructed defecation.
In Group III, the number of asymmetric patients was significantly higher than non-asymmetric ones (P < 0.0001). Asymmetry values were significantly higher in group III than in groups I and II considering squeeze (P < 0.0001) or resting pressures (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant association between anal asymmetry and both anal incontinence (P < 0.0001) and rectal prolapse (P = 0.0270). No such association was found between anal asymmetry and obstructed defecation.
Anal vector manometry using vector analysis of resting and squeeze pressures is complementary to endoanal ultrasonography, as it provides information on anal sphincter function and integrity. The vector asymmetry index >20% correlates with fecal incontinence due to anal sphincter lesions. Therefore, anal vector manometry may be useful as an independent method of screening for pregnant women at risk of sphincter injury and for patients undergoing anorectal surgery with risk factors for incontinence, like previous anorectal surgery or a history of two or more previous vaginal deliveries.
不同的试验已经研究了常规肛门测压在盆底疾病诊断中的作用。本研究旨在定义矢量肛门测压和矢量不对称指数评分在评估盆底疾病(即粪便失禁和排便困难)中的作用和有效性。
2005 年至 2007 年,意大利罗马 Tor Vergata 大学医院外科的 387 名患者接受了临床和测压评估,并被纳入本前瞻性队列研究。所有患者均接受了临床检查、Wexner 失禁评分和肛门矢量测压,并分为三组。第 I 组包括静息肛门压力值正常的患者(195 例)。第 II 组和第 III 组分别包括静息肛门压力值高于和低于正常值的患者(分别为 90 例和 102 例)。所有患者均根据矢量不对称指数使用 20%的截断值分为不对称和非不对称。我们研究了肛门不对称与盆底疾病(即括约肌损伤引起的粪便失禁、直肠脱垂和排便困难)之间的相关性。
在第 III 组中,不对称患者的数量明显多于非不对称患者(P<0.0001)。与第 I 组和第 II 组相比,第 III 组的收缩压(P<0.0001)和静息压(P<0.0001)的不对称值明显更高。此外,肛门不对称与肛门失禁(P<0.0001)和直肠脱垂(P=0.0270)之间存在统计学显著关联。然而,肛门不对称与排便困难之间没有这种关联。
使用静息和收缩压矢量分析的肛门矢量测压与腔内超声检查互补,因为它提供了关于肛门括约肌功能和完整性的信息。矢量不对称指数>20%与因肛门括约肌损伤引起的粪便失禁相关。因此,肛门矢量测压可能是一种有用的筛查方法,用于筛查有括约肌损伤风险的孕妇和有失禁风险的接受肛门直肠手术的患者,如既往肛门直肠手术或有两次或两次以上阴道分娩史。