Suppr超能文献

植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的电风暴。

Electrical storms in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Cardiac and Vascular Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2011 Jan;52(1):26-32. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2011.52.1.26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In some patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), multiple episodes of electrical storm (ES) can occur. We assessed the prevalence, features, and predictors of ES in patients with ICD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-five patients with an ICD were analyzed. ES was defined as the occurrence of two or more ventricular tachyarrhythmias within 24 hours.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients experienced at least one ES episode, and 16 patients experienced two or more ES episodes. The first ES occurred 209 ± 277 days after ICD implantation. In most ES cases, the index arrhythmia was ventricular tachycardia (65%). There were no obvious etiologic factors at the onset of most ES episodes (57%). More patients with a structurally normal heart (p = 0.043) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the index arrhythmia (p = 0.017) were in the ES-free group. Kaplan-Meier estimates and a log-rank test showed that patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) (log-rank test, p = 0.016) or with left ventricular ejection fraction < 35% (p = 0.032) were more likely to experience ES, and that patients with VF (p = 0.047) were less affected by ES. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that nonischemic DCMP correlated with a greater probability of ES (hazard ratio, 3.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-11.85; p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

ES is a common and recurrent event in patients with an ICD. Nonischemic DCMP is an independent predictor of ES. Patients with VF or with a structurally normal heart are less likely to experience ES.

摘要

目的

在一些植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)患者中,可能会发生多次电风暴(ES)。我们评估了 ICD 患者 ES 的发生率、特征和预测因素。

材料和方法

分析了 85 例 ICD 患者。ES 定义为 24 小时内发生两次或两次以上室性心动过速。

结果

26 例患者至少经历过一次 ES 发作,16 例患者经历过两次或两次以上 ES 发作。第一次 ES 发生在 ICD 植入后 209±277 天。在大多数 ES 病例中,起始心律失常为室性心动过速(65%)。大多数 ES 发作时没有明显的病因因素(57%)。结构性正常心脏(p=0.043)或室颤(VF)作为起始心律失常(p=0.017)的患者更可能不在 ES 组。Kaplan-Meier 估计和对数秩检验显示,非缺血性扩张型心肌病(DCMP)患者(对数秩检验,p=0.016)或左心室射血分数<35%的患者(p=0.032)更易发生 ES,而 VF 患者(p=0.047)较少受 ES 影响。Cox 比例风险回归分析显示,非缺血性 DCMP 与 ES 发生的可能性更大相关(危险比,3.71;95%置信区间,1.16-11.85;p=0.027)。

结论

ES 是 ICD 患者常见且反复发生的事件。非缺血性 DCMP 是 ES 的独立预测因素。VF 或结构性正常心脏的患者不太可能发生 ES。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f1f/3017704/50535d5e03a1/ymj-52-26-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验