Moss Arthur J, Zareba Wojciech, Hall W Jackson, Klein Helmut, Wilber David J, Cannom David S, Daubert James P, Higgins Steven L, Brown Mary W, Andrews Mark L
Cardiology Unit of the Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):877-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013474. Epub 2002 Mar 19.
Patients with reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction are at risk for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. This randomized trial was designed to evaluate the effect of an implantable defibrillator on survival in such patients.
Over the course of four years, we enrolled 1232 patients with a prior myocardial infarction and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.30 or less. Patients were randomly assigned in a 3:2 ratio to receive an implantable defibrillator (742 patients) or conventional medical therapy (490 patients). Invasive electrophysiological testing for risk stratification was not required. Death from any cause was the end point.
The clinical characteristics at base line and the prevalence of medication use at the time of the last follow-up visit were similar in the two treatment groups. During an average follow-up of 20 months, the mortality rates were 19.8 percent in the conventional-therapy group and 14.2 percent in the defibrillator group. The hazard ratio for the risk of death from any cause in the defibrillator group as compared with the conventional-therapy group was 0.69 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.51 to 0.93; P=0.016). The effect of defibrillator therapy on survival was similar in subgroup analyses stratified according to age, sex, ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, and the QRS interval.
In patients with a prior myocardial infarction and advanced left ventricular dysfunction, prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator improves survival and should be considered as a recommended therapy.
心肌梗死后左心室功能降低的患者面临危及生命的室性心律失常风险。本随机试验旨在评估植入式除颤器对此类患者生存率的影响。
在四年期间,我们纳入了1232例既往有心肌梗死且左心室射血分数为0.30或更低的患者。患者按3:2的比例随机分配,接受植入式除颤器治疗(742例患者)或传统药物治疗(490例患者)。无需进行有创电生理检查以进行危险分层。以任何原因导致的死亡作为终点。
两个治疗组的基线临床特征以及最后一次随访时的药物使用情况相似。在平均20个月的随访期间,传统治疗组的死亡率为19.8%,除颤器组为14.2%。与传统治疗组相比,除颤器组任何原因导致死亡风险的风险比为0.69(95%置信区间,0.51至0.93;P = 0.016)。在根据年龄、性别、射血分数、纽约心脏协会分级和QRS间期进行分层的亚组分析中,除颤器治疗对生存的影响相似。
对于既往有心肌梗死且左心室功能严重不全的患者,预防性植入除颤器可提高生存率,应被视为推荐治疗方法。