Suppr超能文献

比较巴布亚新几内亚野外样本中四种共生疟原虫种的检测和定量的诊断方法。

Comparison of diagnostic methods for the detection and quantification of the four sympatric Plasmodium species in field samples from Papua New Guinea.

机构信息

Papua New Guinea Insitute of Medical Research, Madang 511, Papua New Guinea.

出版信息

Malar J. 2010 Dec 14;9:361. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-361.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of Plasmodium infections is essential for malaria morbidity and mortality reduction in tropical areas. Despite great advantages of light microscopy (LM) for malaria diagnosis, its limited sensitivity is a critical shortfall for epidemiological studies. Robust molecular diagnostics tools are thus needed.

METHODS

The present study describes the development of a duplex quantitative real time PCR (qPCR) assay, which specifically detects and quantifies the four human Plasmodium species. Performance of this method was compared to PCR-ligase detection reaction-fluorescent microsphere assay (PCR_LDR_FMA), nested PCR (nPCR) and LM, using field samples collected from 452 children one to five years of age from the Sepik area in Papua New Guinea. Agreement between diagnostic methods was calcualted using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The agreement of qPCR with other molecular diagnostic methods was substantial for the detection of P. falciparum, but was moderate for the detection of P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale. P. falciparum and P. vivax prevalence by qPCR was 40.9% and 65.7% respectively. This compares to 43.8% and 73.2% by nPCR and 47.1% and 67.5% by PCR_LDR_FMA. P. malariae and P. ovale prevalence was 4.7% and 7.3% by qPCR, 3.3% and 3.8% by nPCR, and 7.7% and 4.4% by PCR_LDR_FMA. Prevalence by LM was lower for all four species, being 25.4% for P. falciparum, 54.9% for P. vivax, 2.4% for P. malariae and 0.0% for P. ovale. The quantification by qPCR closely correlated with microscopic quantification for P. falciparum and P. vivax samples (R2 = 0.825 and R2 = 0.505, respectively). The low prevalence of P. malariae and P. ovale did not permit a solid comparative analysis of quantification for these species.

CONCLUSIONS

The qPCR assay developed proved optimal for detection of all four Plasmodium species. Densities by LM were well reflected in quantification results by qPCR, whereby congruence was better for P. falciparum than for P. vivax. This likely is a consequence of the generally lower P. vivax densities. Easy performance of the qPCR assay, a less laborious workflow and reduced risk of contamination, together with reduced costs per sample through reduced reaction volume, opens the possibility to implement qPCR in endemic settings as a suitable diagnostic tool for large epidemiological studies.

摘要

背景

准确诊断疟原虫感染对于减少热带地区疟疾的发病率和死亡率至关重要。尽管 显微镜检查(LM)在疟疾诊断方面具有很大的优势,但它的灵敏度有限,这是一个严重的缺陷,无法满足流行病学研究的需求。因此,需要稳健的分子诊断工具。

方法

本研究描述了一种双定量实时 PCR(qPCR)检测方法的开发,该方法专门检测和定量四种人类疟原虫。使用从巴布亚新几内亚塞皮克地区采集的 452 名 1 至 5 岁儿童的现场样本,比较了该方法与 PCR-连接酶检测反应-荧光微球检测(PCR-LDR-FMA)、巢式 PCR(nPCR)和 LM 的性能。使用kappa 统计计算诊断方法之间的一致性。

结果

qPCR 与其他分子诊断方法在检测恶性疟原虫方面具有很好的一致性,但在检测间日疟原虫、三日疟原虫和卵形疟原虫方面的一致性中等。qPCR 检测到的恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫的流行率分别为 40.9%和 65.7%。与之相比,nPCR 检测到的恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫的流行率分别为 43.8%和 73.2%,PCR-LDR-FMA 检测到的恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫的流行率分别为 47.1%和 67.5%。qPCR 检测到的三日疟原虫和卵形疟原虫的流行率分别为 4.7%和 7.3%,nPCR 检测到的三日疟原虫和卵形疟原虫的流行率分别为 3.3%和 3.8%,PCR-LDR-FMA 检测到的三日疟原虫和卵形疟原虫的流行率分别为 7.7%和 4.4%。所有四种疟原虫的 LM 检测流行率均较低,其中恶性疟原虫为 25.4%,间日疟原虫为 54.9%,三日疟原虫为 2.4%,卵形疟原虫为 0.0%。qPCR 定量与恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫样本的显微镜定量密切相关(R2=0.825 和 R2=0.505)。三日疟原虫和卵形疟原虫的低流行率使得这些物种的定量比较分析不够可靠。

结论

所开发的 qPCR 检测方法对于检测所有四种疟原虫都非常有效。LM 检测的密度很好地反映在 qPCR 的定量结果中,其中恶性疟原虫的一致性优于间日疟原虫。这可能是由于间日疟原虫的密度通常较低所致。qPCR 检测方法易于操作,工作流程更省力,污染风险更低,同时通过减少反应体积降低了每个样本的成本,为在流行地区实施 qPCR 作为适合大规模流行病学研究的诊断工具提供了可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d93/3016373/4a1ca2618ac8/1475-2875-9-361-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验