• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全直肠系膜切除时代 T3N0 直肠癌的辅助治疗-高危患者的识别。

Adjuvant therapy for T3N0 rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era- identification of the high risk patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, PR China.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2010 Dec 15;5:118. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-118.

DOI:10.1186/1748-717X-5-118
PMID:21156077
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3009675/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy for T3N0 rectal cancer was controversial with respect to both radiation and the use of a combined regimen of chemotherapy. We evaluated both clinical features and biomarkers and sought to determine risk factors for those patients retrospectively.

METHODS

A total of 122 patients with T3N0 rectal cancer were analyzed in this study from January 2000 to December 2005. Clinicopathologic and biomarkers were used to predict local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up interval was 45.4 months. Five-year LR, DFS, and OS rates were 10.4%, 68.3%, and 88.7%. Having a lower tumor location and showing low P21 and high CD44v6 expression were identified as risk factors for LR: patients with two or three of these risk factors had a higher 5-year LR rate (19.3%) than did patients with none or one of these risk factors (6.8%) (p = 0.05). A poorer DFS was related to low P21 nor high CD44v6 expression but not to tumor location: the 5-year DFS rates were 79.3% for those with neither, 65.9% for those with either one or the other, and 16.9% for those with both (p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic model including tumor location, P21 and CD44v6 expressions could help to distinguish these patients with high risk T3N0 patients and determine whether adjuvant therapy was beneficial.

摘要

背景

对于 T3N0 直肠癌,辅助治疗在放疗和联合化疗方案的使用方面存在争议。我们评估了临床特征和生物标志物,并试图从回顾性角度确定这些患者的危险因素。

方法

本研究共分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月期间的 122 例 T3N0 直肠癌患者。临床病理和生物标志物用于预测局部复发(LR)、无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)。

结果

中位随访时间为 45.4 个月。5 年 LR、DFS 和 OS 率分别为 10.4%、68.3%和 88.7%。肿瘤位置较低、P21 表达较低和 CD44v6 表达较高被确定为 LR 的危险因素:具有两个或三个这些危险因素的患者 5 年 LR 率(19.3%)高于没有或只有一个这些危险因素的患者(6.8%)(p=0.05)。DFS 较差与 P21 表达降低或 CD44v6 表达升高无关,但与肿瘤位置有关:无两者的 5 年 DFS 率为 79.3%,有一个或另一个的为 65.9%,两者均有的为 16.9%(p=0.00)。

结论

包括肿瘤位置、P21 和 CD44v6 表达的预后模型可以帮助区分这些高危 T3N0 患者,并确定辅助治疗是否有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/92bac4d14643/1748-717X-5-118-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/7cfc20075ba0/1748-717X-5-118-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/9c0dac91b1c3/1748-717X-5-118-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/34dc443bcc8e/1748-717X-5-118-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/30ed2470bbc5/1748-717X-5-118-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/92bac4d14643/1748-717X-5-118-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/7cfc20075ba0/1748-717X-5-118-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/9c0dac91b1c3/1748-717X-5-118-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/34dc443bcc8e/1748-717X-5-118-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/30ed2470bbc5/1748-717X-5-118-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0694/3009675/92bac4d14643/1748-717X-5-118-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Adjuvant therapy for T3N0 rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era- identification of the high risk patients.全直肠系膜切除时代 T3N0 直肠癌的辅助治疗-高危患者的识别。
Radiat Oncol. 2010 Dec 15;5:118. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-118.
2
In the era of total mesorectal excision: adjuvant radiotherapy may be unnecessary for pT3N0 rectal cancer.在全直肠系膜切除时代:pT3N0 直肠癌可能无需辅助放疗。
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jul 22;9:159. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-159.
3
Two-week Course of Preoperative Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma: 8 Years' Experience in a Single Institute.局部晚期直肠腺癌术前放疗两周疗程:单机构8年经验
Am J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;40(3):266-273. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000142.
4
Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.全直肠系膜切除试验中接受腹会阴联合切除术治疗的直肠癌患者不良结局的危险因素。
Ann Surg. 2007 Jul;246(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000259432.29056.9d.
5
The role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: a retrospective study.辅助性盆腔放疗在直肠癌合并同步肝转移中的作用:一项回顾性研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2010 Aug 31;5:75. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-75.
6
Rectal cancer: local recurrence after surgery without radiotherapy.直肠癌:术后未行放疗的局部复发
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Mar;44(3):374-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02234736.
7
Sequential boost in neoadjuvant irradiation for T3N0-1 rectal cancer: long-term results from a single-center experience.T3N0-1期直肠癌新辅助放疗的序贯强化:单中心经验的长期结果
Tumori. 2016 Jun 2;2016(3):316-22. doi: 10.5301/tj.5000481. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
8
Depth of mesorectal invasion has prognostic significance in T3N0 low rectal cancer.直肠系膜侵犯深度在T3N0低位直肠癌中具有预后意义。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):124-7.
9
Complete pathologic response following preoperative chemoradiation therapy for middle to lower rectal cancer is not a prognostic factor for a better outcome.中低位直肠癌术前放化疗后的完全病理缓解并非预后更好的预测因素。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Nov;47(11):1798-807. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0681-1.
10
T3N0 rectal cancer: results following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy.T3N0期直肠癌:锐性直肠系膜切除术后且未行辅助治疗的结果
J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec;3(6):642-7. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80087-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prognostic Nomogram for T3N0 Rectal Cancer After Total Mesorectal Excision to Help Select Patients for Adjuvant Therapy.全直肠系膜切除术后T3N0直肠癌的预后列线图,以帮助选择辅助治疗的患者。
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 25;11:698866. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.698866. eCollection 2021.
2
Risk factors for locoregional recurrence in patients with pathologic T3N0 rectal cancer with negative resection margin treated by surgery alone.单纯手术治疗的病理T3N0直肠癌且切缘阴性患者局部区域复发的危险因素。
Radiat Oncol J. 2019 Jun;37(2):110-116. doi: 10.3857/roj.2019.00199. Epub 2019 Jun 30.
3
Prognostic Significance of Microvessel Density Determining by Endoglin in Stage II Rectal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of treatment outcome by CD44v6 after total mesorectal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer.局部晚期直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术后CD44v6对治疗结果的预测
Cancer J. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):54-61. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181629a67.
2
cT3N0 rectal cancer: potential overtreatment with preoperative chemoradiotherapy is warranted.cT3N0期直肠癌:术前放化疗存在潜在过度治疗的情况,有必要进行评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 20;26(3):368-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5434.
3
Rectal cancer at the crossroads: the dilemma of clinically staged T3, N0, M0 disease.
内皮糖蛋白测定的微血管密度在Ⅱ期直肠癌中的预后意义:一项回顾性分析
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:504179. doi: 10.1155/2015/504179. Epub 2015 May 21.
4
Patterns of Pelvic Radiotherapy in Patients with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer.II/III期直肠癌患者的盆腔放疗模式
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;2013:408460. doi: 10.1155/2013/408460. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
5
Lack of CD44 variant 6 expression in rectal cancer invasive front associates with early recurrence.结直肠癌侵袭前缘中 CD44 变体 6 表达缺失与早期复发相关。
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Sep 7;18(33):4549-56. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i33.4549.
6
Neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: actual status.直肠癌新辅助治疗:现状
Chemother Res Pract. 2011;2011:839742. doi: 10.1155/2011/839742. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
直肠癌处于十字路口:临床分期为T3、N0、M0疾病的困境。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 20;26(3):350-1. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6365.
4
Expression and significance of CD44s, CD44v6, and nm23 mRNA in human cancer.CD44s、CD44v6和nm23 mRNA在人类癌症中的表达及意义
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov 14;11(42):6601-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i42.6601.
5
Effectiveness of gene expression profiling for response prediction of rectal adenocarcinomas to preoperative chemoradiotherapy.基因表达谱分析对直肠癌术前放化疗反应预测的有效性
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):1826-38. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.406.
6
Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.直肠癌术前与术后放化疗对比
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694.
7
Impact of T and N stage and treatment on survival and relapse in adjuvant rectal cancer: a pooled analysis.T和N分期及治疗对辅助性直肠癌生存和复发的影响:一项汇总分析
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):1785-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.173. Epub 2004 Apr 5.
8
Dynamic expression profile of p21WAF1/CIP1 and Ki-67 predicts survival in rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy.p21WAF1/CIP1和Ki-67的动态表达谱可预测术前放化疗治疗直肠癌的生存率。
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Sep 15;21(18):3391-401. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.077. Epub 2003 Jul 28.
9
Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control--final report of intergroup 0114.直肠癌辅助治疗:分期、性别及局部控制分析——组间0114最终报告
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 1;20(7):1744-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.07.132.
10
Molecular markers are predictors of recurrence and survival in patients with Dukes B and Dukes C colorectal adenocarcinoma.分子标志物是 Dukes B 期和 Dukes C 期结直肠癌患者复发和生存的预测指标。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Apr;44(4):523-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02234324.