• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟教学中习得手术技能的保持情况的定量评估。

Quantitative evaluation of retention of surgical skills learned in simulation.

机构信息

Simulation and Education Training Center, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85006, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.05.005
PMID:21156302
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While initial results suggest that simulation does promote learning, there is a dearth of studies that define the extent to which skills learned through simulation are retained.

METHODS

Residents skills were measured upon completion of an initial simulation training (baseline scores) and then every month for 6 months. Analysis was also performed to identify the number of iterations of practice required to regain baseline scores.

RESULTS

While skill scores did not deteriorate from baseline after the first 3 months (p = 0.61, p = 0.44, p = 0.2, respectively), all scores (except time elapsed) reflected significant deterioration from the fourth month onward (p < 0.05, p < 0.032, p < 0.02). However the number of practice sessions required to regain baseline scores was significantly less than that required to achieve the baseline skill set (p < 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Skills learned through simulation show significant deterioration over long periods of time, suggesting that periodic retraining of skills may be necessary to maintain surgical proficiency.

摘要

背景

尽管初步结果表明模拟确实可以促进学习,但缺乏研究来定义通过模拟学习的技能在多大程度上得到保留。

方法

在完成初始模拟培训后(基线分数),居民的技能每 1 个月测量一次,共测量 6 个月。还进行了分析以确定需要多少次练习才能恢复基线分数。

结果

虽然在前 3 个月后技能分数没有从基线下降(分别为 p = 0.61、p = 0.44、p = 0.2),但从第四个月开始,所有分数(除时间外)都显著下降(p < 0.05、p < 0.032、p < 0.02)。然而,恢复基线分数所需的练习次数明显少于达到基线技能所需的次数(p < 0.0003)。

结论

通过模拟学习获得的技能在很长一段时间内会显著恶化,这表明可能需要定期进行技能再培训以保持手术熟练度。

相似文献

1
Quantitative evaluation of retention of surgical skills learned in simulation.模拟教学中习得手术技能的保持情况的定量评估。
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):421-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
2
Assessing the skills of surgical residents using simulation.使用模拟评估外科住院医师的技能。
J Surg Educ. 2008 Mar-Apr;65(2):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.11.003.
3
Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.虚拟现实模拟器MIST VR上腹腔镜手术技能的学习率:人机界面质量
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Jul;81(4):281-6.
4
Implementation of full patient simulation training in surgical residency.在外科住院医师培训中实施全患者模拟培训。
J Surg Educ. 2010 Nov-Dec;67(6):393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
5
Role of simulation in surgical education and training.模拟在外科教育与培训中的作用。
ANZ J Surg. 2009 Mar;79(3):127-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04829.x.
6
Framework for systematic training and assessment of technical skills.技术技能系统培训与评估框架
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):697-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.01.016.
7
Performance goals on simulators boost resident motivation and skills laboratory attendance.模拟器上的表现目标提高了住院医师的积极性和实验室的出勤率。
J Surg Educ. 2010 Mar-Apr;67(2):66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.02.002.
8
Training on a virtual reality simulator--is it really possible a correct evaluation of the surgeons' experience?在虚拟现实模拟器上进行训练——真的能够正确评估外科医生的经验吗?
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2009 Jul-Sep;113(3):780-7.
9
Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.ProMIS腹腔镜模拟器的结构效度。
Surg Endosc. 2009 May;23(5):1150. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0327-4. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
10
Cognitive simulators for medical education and training.用于医学教育与培训的认知模拟器
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Aug;42(4):593-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of a surgical skills lab for trainee surgeons: a 10-year experience at the Münster University Hospital.实习外科医生手术技能实验室的开发与评估:明斯特大学医院的十年经验
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):484. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07064-3.
2
Surgery and technical skill decay.手术及技术技能衰退。
Int J Surg. 2025 May 1;111(5):3399-3413. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002313.
3
The impact of surgical simulation and training technologies on general surgery education.手术模拟和培训技术对普通外科学教育的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):1297. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06299-w.
4
The efficacy of simulation-based learning versus non-simulation-based learning in endocrinology education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于模拟的学习与非基于模拟的学习在内分泌学教育中的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1069. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06010-z.
5
Pediatric Chest Compression Improvement Via Augmented Reality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Feedback in Community General Emergency Departments: A Mixed-Methods Simulation-Based Pilot Study.基于混合方法的模拟研究:社区综合急救部门中通过增强现实心肺复苏反馈改善儿科胸部按压
J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;64(6):696-708. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.03.058. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
6
Effectiveness of a comprehensive mental skills curriculum in enhancing surgical performance: Results of a randomized controlled trial.综合心理技能课程对提高手术操作水平的有效性:一项随机对照试验的结果
Am J Surg. 2017 Feb;213(2):318-324. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
[Simulation in surgical training].[外科训练中的模拟]
HNO. 2017 Jan;65(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0248-1.
8
Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills to Teach and Study Retention of Fourth-Degree Laceration Repair Skills.用于教授和研究四度会阴裂伤修复技能保持情况的客观结构化技术技能评估
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Mar;7(1):32-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00233.1.
9
Simulation-based training for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial: virtual-reality versus black-box simulation.基于模拟的胸腔镜肺叶切除术培训:一项随机对照试验:虚拟现实与黑箱模拟
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jun;28(6):1821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3392-7. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
10
Intern olympics as a tool to reinforce surgical skills acquisition.实习医生奥运会作为强化手术技能习得的一种工具。
J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Jun;4(2):266. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00232.1.