Barkauskas Violet H, Pohl Joanne M, Tanner Clare, Onifade Tiffiani J M, Pilon Bonnie
School of Nursing, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Nurs Adm Q. 2011 Jan-Mar;35(1):34-43. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0b013e3182032165.
The purposes of this article are to: (a) describe the first, national, collection of quality measures for nurse-managed health centers (NMHCs); (b) present the quality findings; (c) compare findings with national ambulatory care benchmarks; and (d) discuss the feasibility of national quality data collection, including NMHCs' experiences with data submission and the utilization of findings.
Quality outcomes appropriate for aggregated assessment of NMHC quality were proposed by a committee of the National Institute for Nursing Centers. Quality measures related to these outcomes were developed for breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, diabetes care, hypertension management, and smoking cessation based on protocols of the Health care Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Nine NMHCs were recruited to participate in retrospective data collection, manually from record audits or electronically from the submission of data files.
Overall, quality measure findings compared favorably with national benchmarks, with particularly high quality demonstrated for chronic disease care management.
Good to very good quality of care was documented across NMHCs, and NMHCs compared favorably with national benchmarks. Data were useful to NMHCs in identifying quality strengths and areas for improvement. National data collection proved to be feasible.
本文目的如下:(a)描述首个全国性的护士主导型健康中心(NMHCs)质量指标集;(b)呈现质量调查结果;(c)将结果与全国门诊医疗基准进行比较;(d)讨论全国性质量数据收集的可行性,包括NMHCs的数据提交经验及结果的利用情况。
美国国家护理中心协会的一个委员会提出了适用于综合评估NMHCs质量的质量结果。基于医疗保健效果数据和信息集的协议,针对乳腺癌筛查、宫颈癌筛查、糖尿病护理、高血压管理和戒烟制定了与这些结果相关的质量指标。招募了9个NMHCs参与回顾性数据收集,数据收集方式为人工记录审核或通过提交数据文件进行电子收集。
总体而言,质量指标结果与全国基准相比表现良好,慢性病护理管理方面的质量尤其高。
NMHCs的护理质量记录为良好到非常好,且与全国基准相比表现良好。数据对NMHCs识别质量优势和改进领域很有用。事实证明全国性数据收集是可行的。