Benkert R, Dennehy P, White J, Hamilton A, Tanner C, Pohl J M
Wayne State University , Nursing, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
GLIDE , San Francisco, California, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Aug 20;5(3):757-72. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0019. eCollection 2014.
In this new era after the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009, the literature on lessons learned with electronic health record (EHR) implementation needs to be revisited.
Our objective was to describe what implementation of a commercially available EHR with built-in quality query algorithms showed us about our care for diabetes and hypertension populations in four safety net clinics, specifically feasibility of data retrieval, measurements over time, quality of data, and how our teams used this data.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2008 to October 2012 in four safety-net clinics located in the Midwest and Western United States. A data warehouse that stores data from across the U.S was utilized for data extraction from patients with diabetes or hypertension diagnoses and at least two office visits per year. Standard quality measures were collected over a period of two to four years. All sites were engaged in a partnership model with the IT staff and a shared learning process to enhance the use of the quality metrics.
While use of the algorithms was feasible across sites, challenges occurred when attempting to use the query results for research purposes. There was wide variation of both process and outcome results by individual centers. Composite calculations balanced out the differences seen in the individual measures. Despite using consistent quality definitions, the differences across centers had an impact on numerators and denominators. All sites agreed to a partnership model of EHR implementation, and each center utilized the available resources of the partnership for Center-specific quality initiatives.
Utilizing a shared EHR, a Regional Extension Center-like partnership model, and similar quality query algorithms allowed safety-net clinics to benchmark and improve the quality of care across differing patient populations and health care delivery models.
在2009年《经济和临床健康的健康信息技术(HITECH)法案》之后的这个新时代,关于电子健康记录(EHR)实施经验教训的文献需要重新审视。
我们的目的是描述实施具有内置质量查询算法的商用EHR,能让我们了解在四家安全网诊所中对糖尿病和高血压患者群体的护理情况,具体包括数据检索的可行性、随时间的测量、数据质量,以及我们的团队如何使用这些数据。
2008年10月至2012年10月在美国中西部和西部的四家安全网诊所进行了一项横断面研究。利用一个存储来自美国各地数据的数据仓库,从患有糖尿病或高血压诊断且每年至少有两次门诊就诊的患者中提取数据。在两到四年的时间里收集标准质量指标。所有站点都与信息技术人员采用合作模式,并进行共享学习过程,以加强质量指标的使用。
虽然算法在各站点的使用是可行的,但在尝试将查询结果用于研究目的时出现了挑战。各个中心的过程和结果差异很大。综合计算平衡了各个指标中看到的差异。尽管使用了一致的质量定义,但各中心之间的差异对分子和分母产生了影响。所有站点都同意采用EHR实施的合作模式,每个中心都利用合作关系中的可用资源开展针对中心的质量改进计划。
利用共享的EHR、类似区域扩展中心的合作模式以及类似的质量查询算法,安全网诊所能够在不同患者群体和医疗服务提供模式之间进行基准对比并提高护理质量。