Suppr超能文献

四个安全网机构的糖尿病和高血压质量评估:实施同一商业电子健康记录后的经验教训

Diabetes and hypertension quality measurement in four safety-net sites: lessons learned after implementation of the same commercial electronic health record.

作者信息

Benkert R, Dennehy P, White J, Hamilton A, Tanner C, Pohl J M

机构信息

Wayne State University , Nursing, Detroit, Michigan, United States.

GLIDE , San Francisco, California, United States.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Aug 20;5(3):757-72. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-03-RA-0019. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this new era after the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009, the literature on lessons learned with electronic health record (EHR) implementation needs to be revisited.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to describe what implementation of a commercially available EHR with built-in quality query algorithms showed us about our care for diabetes and hypertension populations in four safety net clinics, specifically feasibility of data retrieval, measurements over time, quality of data, and how our teams used this data.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2008 to October 2012 in four safety-net clinics located in the Midwest and Western United States. A data warehouse that stores data from across the U.S was utilized for data extraction from patients with diabetes or hypertension diagnoses and at least two office visits per year. Standard quality measures were collected over a period of two to four years. All sites were engaged in a partnership model with the IT staff and a shared learning process to enhance the use of the quality metrics.

RESULTS

While use of the algorithms was feasible across sites, challenges occurred when attempting to use the query results for research purposes. There was wide variation of both process and outcome results by individual centers. Composite calculations balanced out the differences seen in the individual measures. Despite using consistent quality definitions, the differences across centers had an impact on numerators and denominators. All sites agreed to a partnership model of EHR implementation, and each center utilized the available resources of the partnership for Center-specific quality initiatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a shared EHR, a Regional Extension Center-like partnership model, and similar quality query algorithms allowed safety-net clinics to benchmark and improve the quality of care across differing patient populations and health care delivery models.

摘要

背景

在2009年《经济和临床健康的健康信息技术(HITECH)法案》之后的这个新时代,关于电子健康记录(EHR)实施经验教训的文献需要重新审视。

目的

我们的目的是描述实施具有内置质量查询算法的商用EHR,能让我们了解在四家安全网诊所中对糖尿病和高血压患者群体的护理情况,具体包括数据检索的可行性、随时间的测量、数据质量,以及我们的团队如何使用这些数据。

方法

2008年10月至2012年10月在美国中西部和西部的四家安全网诊所进行了一项横断面研究。利用一个存储来自美国各地数据的数据仓库,从患有糖尿病或高血压诊断且每年至少有两次门诊就诊的患者中提取数据。在两到四年的时间里收集标准质量指标。所有站点都与信息技术人员采用合作模式,并进行共享学习过程,以加强质量指标的使用。

结果

虽然算法在各站点的使用是可行的,但在尝试将查询结果用于研究目的时出现了挑战。各个中心的过程和结果差异很大。综合计算平衡了各个指标中看到的差异。尽管使用了一致的质量定义,但各中心之间的差异对分子和分母产生了影响。所有站点都同意采用EHR实施的合作模式,每个中心都利用合作关系中的可用资源开展针对中心的质量改进计划。

结论

利用共享的EHR、类似区域扩展中心的合作模式以及类似的质量查询算法,安全网诊所能够在不同患者群体和医疗服务提供模式之间进行基准对比并提高护理质量。

相似文献

2
Adult patient access to electronic health records.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):CD012707. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012707.pub2.
3
MetroHealth Care Plus: Effects Of A Prepared Safety Net On Quality Of Care In A Medicaid Expansion Population.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jul;34(7):1121-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1380.
5
Electronic health records and quality of diabetes care.
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 1;365(9):825-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1102519.
6
The High Prevalence of Diabetes in a Large Cohort of Patients Drawn From Safety Net Clinics.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Jun 16;13:E78. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160056.
7
10
Association of Electronic Health Record Use Above Meaningful Use Thresholds With Hospital Quality and Safety Outcomes.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2012529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12529.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of an Electronic Health Record Report to Identify Patients with Delays in Testing for Poorly Controlled Diabetes.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Jun-Jul;48(6-7):335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Assessing Data Adequacy for High Blood Pressure Clinical Decision Support: A Quantitative Analysis.
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Aug;12(4):710-720. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1732401. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.
Diabetes Spectr. 2017 Nov;30(4):301-314. doi: 10.2337/ds17-0067.

本文引用的文献

1
Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094670. eCollection 2014.
2
Response to a mobile health decision-support system for screening and management of tobacco use.
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Mar 1;41(2):145-52. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.145-152.
4
Predictors of success for electronic health record implementation in small physician practices.
Appl Clin Inform. 2013 Jan 16;4(1):12-24. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-09-RA-0033. Print 2013.
6
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013.
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-66. doi: 10.2337/dc13-S011.
8
Clinical quality performance in U.S. health centers.
Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2225-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01418.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Paying for prevention: associations between pay for performance and cessation counseling in primary care practices.
Am J Health Promot. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(4):230-4. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.091118-QUAN-368.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验