Weingarten S, Ermann B, Bolus R, Riedinger M S, Rubin H, Green A, Karns K, Ellrodt A G
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Aug 15;113(4):283-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-4-283.
To determine whether providing private practitioners with triage criteria for their low-risk chest pain patients would safely enhance bed utilization efficiency in coronary and intermediate care units.
Prospective, controlled, interventional trial using an alternate month study design.
A large teaching community hospital.
Cohort of 404 low-risk patients with chest pain for whom a diagnosis of myocardial infarction has been excluded and who have not sustained complications, required interventions, or developed unstable comorbidity.
During intervention months, private practitioners caring for low-risk patients in the coronary and intermediate care units were contacted 24 hours after admission. Physicians were informed that the transfer of low-risk patients to nonmonitored beds could probably be done safely, based on the results of a pilot study. The practitioner had the option of agreeing to or deferring patient transfer. During control months, physicians were not contacted in this way.
Use of the triage criteria by private practitioners reduced lengths of stay in the intermediate and coronary care units by 36% and 53%, respectively. Bed availability increased by 744 intermediate and 372 coronary care unit bed-days per year. Charges decreased by $2.6 million per year and profits improved by $390,000 per year. There were not significant differences in complications between control and intervention patients and in no case (95% CI, 0% to 1.6%) did the triage criteria adversely affect quality of care.
The early transfer triage criteria may be a safe and efficacious decision aid for improving bed utilization in intermediate and coronary care units. In addition, this study shows the feasibility of and potential benefits from applying practice guidelines at a community hospital.
确定为私人执业医生提供低风险胸痛患者的分诊标准是否能安全提高冠心病监护病房和中级护理病房的床位使用效率。
采用隔月研究设计的前瞻性、对照、干预性试验。
一家大型教学社区医院。
404例低风险胸痛患者队列,已排除心肌梗死诊断,且未出现并发症、需要干预或发生不稳定的合并症。
在干预月期间,冠心病监护病房和中级护理病房中负责低风险患者的私人执业医生在患者入院24小时后会接到通知。根据一项试点研究的结果,告知医生将低风险患者安全转移到非监护病床是可行的。医生可以选择同意或推迟患者转移。在对照月期间,不会以这种方式联系医生。
私人执业医生使用分诊标准后,中级护理病房和冠心病监护病房的住院时间分别缩短了36%和53%。每年中级护理病房的床位可使用天数增加了744天,冠心病监护病房增加了372天。每年费用减少260万美元,利润提高39万美元。对照患者和干预患者之间的并发症无显著差异,分诊标准在任何情况下(95%CI,0%至1.6%)均未对护理质量产生不利影响。
早期转移分诊标准可能是提高中级护理病房和冠心病监护病房床位使用效率的一种安全有效的决策辅助工具。此外,本研究表明在社区医院应用实践指南的可行性和潜在益处。