Suppr超能文献

冠心病监护病房与中级护理病房对急诊科胸痛患者的成本效益分析

Cost-effectiveness of a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for emergency department patients with chest pain.

作者信息

Tosteson A N, Goldman L, Udvarhelyi I S, Lee T H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH, USA.

出版信息

Circulation. 1996 Jul 15;94(2):143-50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.2.143.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Guidelines are not available for which patients with acute chest pain should be admitted to the coronary care unit and which patients can be reasonably triaged to monitored beds in lower levels of care.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical and resource utilization data from 12 139 emergency department patients with acute chest pain were used in a decision-analytic model to identify cost-effective guidelines for the admission to a coronary care unit versus an intermediate care unit for initially uncomplicated patients without other indications for intensive care. The probability of clinical complications and death were derived from data on age-specific subsets of the population. Resource utilization estimates were based on cost data from a subset of 901 patients and length of stay data for the entire cohort. The survival benefit associated with initial triage to the coronary care unit instead of an intermediate care unit was assumed to be 15%. In the baseline analysis for 55- to 64-year-old patients, the probability of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at which the coronary care unit had an incremental cost-effectiveness below $50 000 per year-of-life-saved was 29%. Triage to the coronary care unit was somewhat more cost-effective in elderly patients because their higher early complication rate more than offset their shorter life expectancy.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis indicates that the coronary care unit usually should be reserved for patients with a moderate (21% or more, depending on the patient's age) probability of AMI unless patients need intensive care for other reasons. Clinical data suggest that only patients with ECG changes of ischemia or infarction not known to be old have a probability of AMI this high. Intermediate care units are appropriate for patients whose risks are not high enough for a coronary care unit to be cost-effective but too high for other alternatives to be recommended for safety and effectiveness.

摘要

背景

对于哪些急性胸痛患者应收入冠心病监护病房,哪些患者可合理分流至较低护理级别的监测病床,目前尚无相关指南。

方法与结果

在一个决策分析模型中,使用了来自12139例急诊科急性胸痛患者的临床和资源利用数据,以确定对于最初无并发症且无其他重症监护指征的患者,收入冠心病监护病房与中级护理病房的成本效益指南。临床并发症和死亡的概率来自特定年龄人群子集的数据。资源利用估计基于901例患者子集的成本数据和整个队列的住院时间数据。假设与最初分流至冠心病监护病房而非中级护理病房相关的生存获益为15%。在对55至64岁患者的基线分析中,冠心病监护病房每挽救一年生命的增量成本效益低于50000美元时的急性心肌梗死(AMI)概率为29%。在老年患者中,分流至冠心病监护病房在一定程度上更具成本效益,因为他们较高的早期并发症发生率超过了其较短预期寿命的影响。

结论

该分析表明,冠心病监护病房通常应留给AMI概率为中度(根据患者年龄为21%或更高)的患者,除非患者因其他原因需要重症监护。临床数据表明,只有心电图有未知陈旧性缺血或梗死改变的患者才有如此高的AMI概率。中级护理病房适用于风险不够高,以至于冠心病监护病房不具成本效益,但又过高而无法推荐其他更安全有效的替代方案的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验