• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺血性中风患者延迟就诊的磁共振成像辅助溶栓治疗

MRI-assisted thrombolysis for delayed arrival among patients with ischemic stroke.

作者信息

Khatri Rakesh, Miley Jefferson T, Qureshi Adnan I

机构信息

Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Research Center, Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Neuroimaging. 2013 Jul;23(3):317-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00563.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00563.x
PMID:21159019
Abstract

Time window for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke can be based on chronological or physiological (imaging) data. Both of these approaches have their unique strengths and weaknesses. The concept of chronological-based thrombolysis is supported by several randomized clinical trials whereas imaging-based thrombolysis has not been validated entirely by randomized trials. Therefore, careful evaluation of strategies using image-based identification of patients who might benefit from thrombolysis is needed. Patients undergoing thrombolysis on delayed arrival appear to be the most logical group in whom image-based strategies should be evaluated.

摘要

急性缺血性卒中溶栓的时间窗可基于时间顺序或生理学(影像学)数据。这两种方法都有其独特的优势和劣势。基于时间顺序的溶栓概念得到了多项随机临床试验的支持,而基于影像学的溶栓尚未完全通过随机试验得到验证。因此,需要仔细评估使用基于影像学识别可能从溶栓中获益患者的策略。延迟就诊时接受溶栓的患者似乎是最适合评估基于影像学策略的合理人群。

相似文献

1
MRI-assisted thrombolysis for delayed arrival among patients with ischemic stroke.缺血性中风患者延迟就诊的磁共振成像辅助溶栓治疗
J Neuroimaging. 2013 Jul;23(3):317-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00563.x.
2
Remote ischemic perconditioning in thrombolysed stroke patients: randomized study of activating endogenous neuroprotection - design and MRI measurements.溶栓后卒中患者的远程缺血预处理:激活内源性神经保护的随机研究-设计和 MRI 测量。
Int J Stroke. 2013 Feb;8(2):141-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00786.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
3
Current acute stroke trials and their potential impact on the therapeutic time window.当前急性脑卒中试验及其对治疗时间窗的潜在影响。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2012 Feb;12(2):169-77. doi: 10.1586/ern.11.198.
4
MRI-based ultrafast protocol thrombolysis with rt-PA for acute ischemia stroke in 12-hour time window.基于 MRI 的超快速 rt-PA 溶栓方案治疗 12 小时时间窗内的急性缺血性脑卒中。
J Neuroimaging. 2011 Oct;21(4):332-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00544.x. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Poor recognition of prompted treatment seeking even with good knowledge of stroke warning signs contribute to delayed arrival of acute ischemic stroke patients in Thailand.即使对中风预警信号有很好的了解,患者对提示性治疗的认识不足也导致泰国急性缺血性中风患者的就诊时间延迟。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 May-Jun;23(5):948-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
6
Aphasia predicts unfavorable outcome in mild ischemic stroke patients and prompts thrombolytic treatment.失语症预测轻度缺血性中风患者的不良预后,并促使溶栓治疗。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Feb;23(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.11.018. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
7
Current indications and results of thrombolysis by intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂溶栓的当前适应证及结果
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012 Mar;15(1):10-8. doi: 10.1053/j.tvir.2011.12.002.
8
Perfusion computed tomography-guided intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke beyond 4.5 hours: a case-control study.灌注 CT 引导下超 4.5 小时急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗:一项病例对照研究。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;34(1):31-7. doi: 10.1159/000338778. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
9
[Thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Critical analysis of current knowledge].[急性缺血性卒中的溶栓治疗。对当前知识的批判性分析]
Lakartidningen. 2004 Feb 19;101(8):662-8, 670-3.
10
Validation of FLAIR hyperintense lesions as imaging biomarkers to predict the outcome of acute stroke after intra-arterial thrombolysis following intravenous tissue plasminogen activator.FLAIR 高信号病灶作为影像生物标志物预测静脉溶栓后动脉内溶栓治疗急性卒中的结局
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(5):461-8. doi: 10.1159/000350201. Epub 2013 May 31.