Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Scand J Surg. 2010;99(4):240-3. doi: 10.1177/145749691009900412.
Periprosthetic fractures are often located in areas of poor bone quality. There are multiple strategies to manage these fractures. Stable fixation in areas of low bone quality may require the use of cortical bone strut allografts.
Cortical allograft struts were used in the treatment of 71 patients with periprosthetic fractures between a 10 year period from 1/1999 until 12/2008. 18 patients had a periprosthetic fracture around the knee implant, 52 around the hip implant and 1 in between the hip and knee prosthesis. The average follow-up time was 943 days ranging from 90 days to 3428 days.
The overall union rate was 91%. 20 patients died during the follow-up, 6 of them during the first six month after operation. 8 patients (12%) had an diagnosed infection during the follow-up time. The specific strategy chosen to periprosthetic fracture treatment should depend on the quality of the remaining bone stock, type of the implant, location and classification of the fracture and on patients related factors, such age age and comorbidities. Use of cortical bone struts is a good option in fractures associated with poor bone quality. Use of allograft strut combined with a nonlocking plate, which offers the highest stiffness known, may provide superior bio-mechanical stability compared with other methods in some situations.
假体周围骨折常发生在骨质量差的部位。对于这些骨折,有多种治疗策略。在骨质量差的部位实现稳定固定可能需要使用皮质骨支撑同种异体移植物。
1999 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间,我们使用皮质骨同种异体移植物支撑治疗了 71 例假体周围骨折患者。18 例为膝关节假体周围骨折,52 例为髋关节假体周围骨折,1 例为髋关节和膝关节假体之间骨折。平均随访时间为 943 天,范围为 90 天至 3428 天。
总体愈合率为 91%。20 例患者在随访期间死亡,其中 6 例在术后 6 个月内死亡。8 例(12%)患者在随访期间被诊断出感染。假体周围骨折治疗所选择的具体策略应取决于剩余骨量的质量、植入物的类型、骨折的位置和分类以及患者的相关因素,如年龄和合并症。在与骨质量差相关的骨折中,使用皮质骨支撑是一种较好的选择。使用同种异体移植物支撑与非锁定钢板相结合,在某些情况下可能提供比其他方法更高的生物力学稳定性,因为它具有已知的最高刚度。