Haddad Fares S, Duncan Clive P, Berry Daniel J, Lewallen David G, Gross Allan E, Chandler Hugh P
Vancouver General Hospital, Bristish Columbia, Canada.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jun;84(6):945-50.
Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements are increasingly common. When the femoral component is stable, open reduction and internal fixation is recommended in all but exceptional cases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of treatment of fractures around stable implants with cortical onlay strut allografts with or without a plate.
A survey of our four centers identified forty patients with a fracture around a well-fixed femoral stem treated with cortical onlay strut allografts without revision of the femoral component. There were fourteen men and twenty-six women, with an average age of sixty-nine years. Nineteen patients were treated with cortical onlay strut allografts alone, and twenty-one were managed with a plate and one or two cortical struts. All of the patients were followed until fracture union or until a reoperation was done. The mean duration of follow-up was twenty-eight months for thirty-nine patients. One patient, who was noncompliant with treatment recommendations, had a failure at two months because of a fracture of the plate and graft. The primary end point of the evaluation was fracture union; secondary end points included strut-to-host bone union, the amount of final bone stock, and postoperative function.
Thirty-nine (98%) of the forty fractures united, and strut-to-host bone union was typically seen within the first year. There were four malunions, all of which had <10 degrees of malalignment, and one deep infection. There was no evidence of femoral loosening in any patient. All but one of the surviving patients returned to their preoperative functional level within one year.
Cortical onlay strut allografts act as biological bone plates, serving both a mechanical and a biological function. The use of cortical struts, either alone or in conjunction with a plate, led to a very high rate of fracture union, satisfactory alignment, and an increase in femoral bone stock at the time of short-term follow-up. Although this study did not address the potential for later allograft remodeling, our findings suggest that cortical strut grafts should be used routinely to augment fixation and healing of a periprosthetic femoral fracture.
髋关节置换周围的股骨假体周围骨折越来越常见。当股骨组件稳定时,除特殊情况外,建议进行切开复位内固定。本研究的目的是评估使用或不使用钢板的皮质骨贴附支撑异体骨移植治疗稳定植入物周围骨折的疗效。
对我们四个中心的调查确定了40例股骨柄固定良好的周围骨折患者,采用皮质骨贴附支撑异体骨移植治疗,未对股骨组件进行翻修。其中男性14例,女性26例,平均年龄69岁。19例患者仅接受皮质骨贴附支撑异体骨移植治疗,21例患者使用钢板和一或两根皮质骨支撑物进行治疗。所有患者均随访至骨折愈合或再次手术。39例患者的平均随访时间为28个月。1例未遵循治疗建议的患者在两个月时因钢板和移植骨骨折而治疗失败。评估的主要终点是骨折愈合;次要终点包括支撑物与宿主骨愈合、最终骨量以及术后功能。
40例骨折中有39例(98%)愈合,支撑物与宿主骨愈合通常在第一年内出现。有4例畸形愈合,所有畸形愈合的成角均<10度,1例深部感染。没有任何患者出现股骨松动的证据。除1例患者外,所有存活患者在一年内恢复到术前功能水平。
皮质骨贴附支撑异体骨移植起到生物接骨板的作用,兼具机械和生物学功能。单独使用皮质骨支撑物或与钢板联合使用,在短期随访时导致骨折愈合率非常高、对线满意且股骨骨量增加。虽然本研究未涉及后期异体骨重塑的可能性,但我们的研究结果表明,皮质骨支撑移植应常规用于增强股骨假体周围骨折的固定和愈合。