• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 KRAS 野生型肿瘤细胞的长期西妥昔单抗治疗过程中,预测标志物 Amphiregulin 和 Epiregulin mRNAs 的演变。

Evolution of the predictive markers amphiregulin and epiregulin mRNAs during long-term cetuximab treatment of KRAS wild-type tumor cells.

机构信息

Unit of Translational Research, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Girona, Catalonia, Spain.

出版信息

Invest New Drugs. 2012 Apr;30(2):846-52. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9612-2. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10637-010-9612-2
PMID:21161326
Abstract

Molecular mechanisms other than activating KRAS mutations should underlie the occurrence of weaker versus stronger responses to cetuximab (CTX) in EGFR-dependent carcinomas with either an intact KRAS signaling or in which KRAS mutations do not predict CTX efficacy. We hypothesized that KRAS wild-type (WT) tumor cell-line models chronically adapted to grow in the presence of CTX could be interrogated to establish if the positive predictive value of the mRNAs coding for the EGFR ligands amphiregulin (AR) and epiregulin (EPI) could be significantly altered during and/or after treatment with CTX. Gene expression analyses using real-time (kinetic) RT-PCR were performed to monitor the transcriptional evolution of EGFR ligands EGF, TGFα, AR, BTC, EPI, NRG and HB-EGF in experimental modes induced to exhibit acquired resistance to the mono-HER1 inhibitor CTX, the mono-HER2 inhibitor trastuzumab (Tzb) or the dual HER1/HER2 inhibitor lapatinib (LPT). Gene expression signatures for EGFR ligands distinctively related to the occurrence of unresponsiveness to CTX, Tzb or LPT, with minimal overlap between them. CTX's molecular functioning largely depended on the overproduction of the mRNAs coding for the EGFR ligands AR and EPI. Thus, a dramatic down-regulation of AR/EPI mRNA expression occurred upon loss of CTX efficacy in EGFR-positive tumor cells with an intact regulation of RAS signaling. Unlike KRAS mutations, which are informative of unresponsiveness to CTX solely in mCRC, our hypothesis-generating data suggest that expression status of AR and EPI mRNAs might be evaluated as dynamic predictors of response in KRAS WT patients receiving any CTX-based therapy.

摘要

除了激活 KRAS 突变之外,其他分子机制也可能是 EGFR 依赖性癌中 CTX 反应较弱与较强的原因,这些肿瘤要么存在完整的 KRAS 信号,要么 KRAS 突变不能预测 CTX 的疗效。我们假设 KRAS 野生型 (WT) 肿瘤细胞系模型经过长期适应 CTX 的存在而生长,可以进行检测,以确定 EGFR 配体 Amphiregulin (AR) 和 Epiregulin (EPI) 的编码 mRNA 的阳性预测值是否会在 CTX 治疗期间和/或之后发生显著改变。使用实时 (动力学) RT-PCR 进行基因表达分析,以监测 EGFR 配体 EGF、TGFα、AR、BTC、EPI、NRG 和 HB-EGF 在实验模型中的转录进化,这些模型被诱导表现出对单 HER1 抑制剂 CTX、单 HER2 抑制剂曲妥珠单抗 (Tzb) 或双重 HER1/HER2 抑制剂拉帕替尼 (LPT) 的获得性耐药。与 CTX、Tzb 或 LPT 无反应性发生明显相关的 EGFR 配体基因表达特征,它们之间的重叠很小。CTX 的分子功能在很大程度上取决于编码 EGFR 配体 AR 和 EPI 的 mRNA 的过度产生。因此,在具有完整 RAS 信号调节的 EGFR 阳性肿瘤细胞中,CTX 疗效丧失时,AR/EPI mRNA 表达明显下调。与 KRAS 突变不同,KRAS 突变仅在 mCRC 中提示对 CTX 无反应,我们的假设产生数据表明,AR 和 EPI mRNA 的表达状态可能被评估为接受任何基于 CTX 的治疗的 KRAS WT 患者的反应动态预测因子。

相似文献

1
Evolution of the predictive markers amphiregulin and epiregulin mRNAs during long-term cetuximab treatment of KRAS wild-type tumor cells.在 KRAS 野生型肿瘤细胞的长期西妥昔单抗治疗过程中,预测标志物 Amphiregulin 和 Epiregulin mRNAs 的演变。
Invest New Drugs. 2012 Apr;30(2):846-52. doi: 10.1007/s10637-010-9612-2. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
2
Cross-suppression of EGFR ligands amphiregulin and epiregulin and de-repression of FGFR3 signalling contribute to cetuximab resistance in wild-type KRAS tumour cells.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)配体 Amphiregulin 和 Epiregulin 的交叉抑制以及成纤维细胞生长因子受体 3(FGFR3)信号的去抑制导致野生型 KRAS 肿瘤细胞对西妥昔单抗产生耐药性。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Apr 10;106(8):1406-14. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.103.
3
Interferon/STAT1 and neuregulin signaling pathways are exploratory biomarkers of cetuximab (Erbitux®) efficacy in KRAS wild-type squamous carcinomas: a pathway-based analysis of whole human-genome microarray data from cetuximab-adapted tumor cell-line models.干扰素/STAT1 和神经调节素信号通路是西妥昔单抗(爱必妥®)在 KRAS 野生型鳞状细胞癌中疗效的探索性生物标志物:基于通路的全基因组微阵列数据分析来自西妥昔单抗适应的肿瘤细胞系模型。
Int J Oncol. 2011 Dec;39(6):1455-79. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1155. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
4
Stem cell property epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is a core transcriptional network for predicting cetuximab (Erbitux™) efficacy in KRAS wild-type tumor cells.干细胞特性上皮间质转化是预测 KRAS 野生型肿瘤细胞中西妥昔单抗(爱必妥)疗效的核心转录网络。
J Cell Biochem. 2011 Jan;112(1):10-29. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22952.
5
Biomarkers of benefit from cetuximab-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: interaction of EGFR ligand expression with RAS/RAF, PIK3CA genotypes.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)配体表达与 RAS/RAF、PIK3CA 基因型与西妥昔单抗为基础的治疗转移性结直肠癌获益的相关性:生物标志物。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Feb 2;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-49.
6
Amphiregulin and epiregulin mRNA expression in primary tumors predicts outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.原发肿瘤中双调蛋白和表皮调节素mRNA的表达可预测接受西妥昔单抗治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的预后。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 20;27(30):5068-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3744. Epub 2009 Sep 8.
7
[Correlation between the presence of Kras mutation and the presence of the proteins epiregulin and amphiregulin in colon cancer tissue].[结肠癌组织中Kras突变的存在与表皮调节素和双调蛋白的存在之间的相关性]
Harefuah. 2013 Jun;152(6):326-9, 369.
8
Amphiregulin and Epiregulin mRNA expression in primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastases.原发性结直肠癌及其相应肝转移组织中 Amphiregulin 和 Epiregulin 的 mRNA 表达。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;12:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-88.
9
A novel predictive strategy by immunohistochemical analysis of four EGFR ligands in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR antibodies.一种通过免疫组化分析四种 EGFR 配体预测转移性结直肠癌接受抗 EGFR 抗体治疗效果的新策略。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;139(3):367-78. doi: 10.1007/s00432-012-1340-x. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
10
Autocrine epidermal growth factor receptor ligand production and cetuximab response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.头颈部鳞状细胞癌细胞系中自分泌表皮生长因子受体配体的产生和西妥昔单抗的反应。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar;138(3):491-9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1127-5. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic and immune factors underlying the efficacy of cetuximab and panitumumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌患者疗效背后的遗传和免疫因素。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2014;18(1):7-16. doi: 10.5114/wo.2013.38566. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
2
Biomarkers of benefit from cetuximab-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: interaction of EGFR ligand expression with RAS/RAF, PIK3CA genotypes.表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)配体表达与 RAS/RAF、PIK3CA 基因型与西妥昔单抗为基础的治疗转移性结直肠癌获益的相关性:生物标志物。
BMC Cancer. 2013 Feb 2;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-49.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How Darwinian models inform therapeutic failure initiated by clonal heterogeneity in cancer medicine.达尔文模型如何为癌症医学中由克隆异质性引发的治疗失败提供信息。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Oct 12;103(8):1139-43. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605912. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
2
Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis.KRAS、BRAF、NRAS 和 PIK3CA 基因突变对西妥昔单抗联合化疗治疗化疗耐药转移性结直肠癌疗效的影响:一项回顾性联盟分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):753-62. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70130-3. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
3
Cross-suppression of EGFR ligands amphiregulin and epiregulin and de-repression of FGFR3 signalling contribute to cetuximab resistance in wild-type KRAS tumour cells.
表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)配体 Amphiregulin 和 Epiregulin 的交叉抑制以及成纤维细胞生长因子受体 3(FGFR3)信号的去抑制导致野生型 KRAS 肿瘤细胞对西妥昔单抗产生耐药性。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Apr 10;106(8):1406-14. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.103.
4
Amphiregulin and Epiregulin mRNA expression in primary colorectal cancer and corresponding liver metastases.原发性结直肠癌及其相应肝转移组织中 Amphiregulin 和 Epiregulin 的 mRNA 表达。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;12:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-88.
5
Immunohistochemical discrimination of wild-type EGFR from EGFRvIII in fixed tumour specimens using anti-EGFR mAbs ICR9 and ICR10.使用抗 EGFR mAb ICR9 和 ICR10 对固定肿瘤标本中的野生型 EGFR 与 EGFRvIII 进行免疫组化鉴别。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Feb 28;106(5):883-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.27. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
6
Autocrine epidermal growth factor receptor ligand production and cetuximab response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.头颈部鳞状细胞癌细胞系中自分泌表皮生长因子受体配体的产生和西妥昔单抗的反应。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar;138(3):491-9. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1127-5. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
7
Pathway profiling and rational trial design for studies in advanced stage cervical carcinoma: a review and a perspective.晚期宫颈癌研究的通路分析与合理试验设计:综述与展望
ISRN Oncol. 2011;2011:403098. doi: 10.5402/2011/403098. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
High concordance of BRAF status between primary colorectal tumours and related metastatic sites: implications for clinical practice.
原发性结直肠癌肿瘤与其相关转移部位之间BRAF状态的高度一致性:对临床实践的影响。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1565. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq318.
4
Understanding resistance to EGFR inhibitors-impact on future treatment strategies.了解针对 EGFR 抑制剂的耐药性——对未来治疗策略的影响。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep;7(9):493-507. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.97. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
5
Lack of evidence for KRAS oncogenic mutations in triple-negative breast cancer.三阴性乳腺癌中缺乏 KRAS 致癌突变的证据。
BMC Cancer. 2010 Apr 13;10:136. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-136.
6
Non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations in the EGFR kinase domain.携带有 EGFR 激酶结构域突变的非小细胞肺癌。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2010 Feb;12(2):75-80. doi: 10.1007/S12094-010-0473-0.
7
Circulating tumour cells in clinical practice: Methods of detection and possible characterization.循环肿瘤细胞在临床实践中的应用:检测方法和可能的特征分析。
Methods. 2010 Apr;50(4):289-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.01.027. Epub 2010 Jan 29.
8
Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中对西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗耐药的分子机制。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1254-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6116. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
9
Cetuximab: from bench to bedside.西妥昔单抗:从实验室到临床。
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2010 Feb;10(1):80-95. doi: 10.2174/156800910790980241.
10
KRAS and BRAF mutational status in primary colorectal tumors and related metastatic sites: biological and clinical implications.原发结直肠肿瘤及其相关转移部位的 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变状态:生物学和临床意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 May;17(5):1429-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0864-z. Epub 2010 Jan 5.