Department of Medical Oncology, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece.
BMC Cancer. 2013 Feb 2;13:49. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-49.
More than half of patients with KRAS-wild type advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) fail anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. We studied EGFR-axis messenger RNA (mRNA) expression and RAS, RAF, PIK3CA mutations in order to identify additional biomarkers of cetuximab efficacy.
Previously genotyped (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour biopsies of 226 cetuximab-treated CRC patients (1st to 3rd line therapy) were assessed for mRNA expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its ligands EGF, Transofrming Growth Factor-a (TGFA), Amphiregulin (AREG) and Epiregulin (EREG) with real time quantitative PCR. Mutations were detected in 72 (31.9%) tumours for KRAS, in 6 (2.65%) for BRAF, in 7 (3.1%) for NRAS and in 37 (16.4%) for PIK3CA.
Only PIK3CA mutations occasionally coexisted with other gene mutations. In univariate analysis, prognostic significance for survival ( from metastases until death) was seen for BRAF mutations (Hazard Ratio HR 8.1, 95% CI 3.4-19), codon 12-only KRAS mutations (HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.1-2.4), high AREG mRNA expression only in KRAS wild type CRC (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.3-0.7) and high EREG mRNA expression irrespective of KRAS mutation status (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.28-0.7). EREG tumoural mRNA expression was significantly associated with a 2.26-fold increased likelihood of objective response to cetuximab therapy (RECIST 1.1). In multivariate analysis, favourable predictive factors were high AREG mRNA in KRAS wild type tumours, high EREG mRNA, low Ephrin A2 receptor mRNA. Cetuximab-treated patients with AREG-low KRAS wild type CRC fared very poorly, their survival being similar to KRAS mutant CRC. Patients with KRAS codon 13 or other non-codon 12 mutations had a median survival (30 months, 95% CI 20-35) similar to that of patients with KRAS wild-type (median survival 29 months, 95% CI 25-35), in contrast to patients with KRAS codon 12 mutations who fared worse (median survival 19 months, 95% CI 15-26).
BRAF and codon 12 KRAS mutations predict for adverse outcome of CRC patients receiving cetuximab. AREG mRNA reflects EGFR signalling in KRAS wild type tumours, predicting for cetuximab efficacy when high and failure when low. EREG may have a prognostic role independent of KRAS mutation.
超过一半的 KRAS 野生型晚期结直肠癌(CRC)患者对抗 EGFR 单克隆抗体治疗无效。我们研究了 EGFR 轴信使 RNA(mRNA)表达和 RAS、RAF、PIK3CA 突变,以确定 cetuximab 疗效的其他生物标志物。
对 226 名接受 cetuximab 治疗的 CRC 患者(一线至三线治疗)的先前已进行基因分型(KRAS、NRAS、BRAF、PIK3CA 突变)的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋肿瘤活检进行表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)及其配体 EGF、转化生长因子-α(TGFA)、 Amphiregulin(AREG)和 Epiregulin(EREG)的实时定量 PCR 检测 mRNA 表达。在 72 例(31.9%)肿瘤中检测到 KRAS 突变,6 例(2.65%)肿瘤中检测到 BRAF 突变,7 例(3.1%)肿瘤中检测到 NRAS 突变,37 例(16.4%)肿瘤中检测到 PIK3CA 突变。
仅 PIK3CA 突变偶尔与其他基因突变共存。单因素分析显示,BRAF 突变(风险比 HR 8.1,95%CI 3.4-19)、仅 codon 12 KRAS 突变(HR 1.62,95%CI 1.1-2.4)、KRAS 野生型 CRC 中高 AREG mRNA 表达(HR 0.47,95%CI 0.3-0.7)和无论 KRAS 突变状态如何高 EREG mRNA 表达(HR 0.45,95%CI 0.28-0.7)与生存(从转移到死亡)的预后意义相关。高 AREG 肿瘤 mRNA 表达与 cetuximab 治疗的客观反应(RECIST 1.1)的可能性增加 2.26 倍相关。多因素分析显示,有利的预测因素是 KRAS 野生型肿瘤中高 AREG mRNA、高 EREG mRNA、低 Ephrin A2 受体 mRNA。接受 cetuximab 治疗的 AREG 低 KRAS 野生型 CRC 患者预后极差,其生存情况与 KRAS 突变型 CRC 相似。KRAS 密码子 13 或其他非密码子 12 突变的患者的中位生存期(30 个月,95%CI 20-35)与 KRAS 野生型患者相似(中位生存期 29 个月,95%CI 25-35),而 KRAS 密码子 12 突变的患者预后较差(中位生存期 19 个月,95%CI 15-26)。
BRAF 和 codon 12 KRAS 突变预测接受 cetuximab 治疗的 CRC 患者的不良预后。AREG mRNA 反映了 KRAS 野生型肿瘤中的 EGFR 信号,当高表达时预测 cetuximab 疗效,低表达时预测失败。EREG 可能具有独立于 KRAS 突变的预后作用。