Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California-San Francisco, 500 Parnassus, MU 320 W, San Francisco, CA 94143-0728, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul;469(7):2081-5. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1740-7. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
Despite the widely reported success of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in reducing pain and improving quality of life and function for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis, rates of TJA use vary widely throughout the United States, with broad disparities based on geographic, racial, and socioeconomic factors. Shared decision-making approaches, which require an exchange of information between patients and their physicians, can be helpful in improving patient satisfaction with their treatment decision and appropriate use of TJA.
QUESTIONS/HYPOTHESES: Expected-value decision analysis models incorporating evidence-based outcome data with individual patient preferences regarding health states and willingness to pay, when used in shared decision-making models, will improve satisfaction among patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis and lead to more appropriate use of TJA.
Patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis will be randomized to usual care or participation in a shared decision-making intervention. Patients in the shared decision-making intervention arm will have their preferences for individual health states related to osteoarthritis and TJA measured using the time trade-off technique, and these values will be incorporated in an expected-value decision analysis model, which also will incorporate the patient's willingness to pay for a particular treatment intervention and evidence-based outcome probabilities. The patient's decision for operative versus nonoperative care and their level of satisfaction with their decision will be compared using chi square and Mann-Whitney rank-sum tests.
Information regarding patient preferences for particular health states and willingness to pay can be combined with evidence-based outcome data in expected-value decision analysis models, which will help inform shared clinical decision making between surgeons and their patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis.
尽管全关节置换术(TJA)在减轻疼痛、提高生活质量和功能方面为髋或膝关节骨关节炎患者带来了广泛的成功,但在美国各地,TJA 的使用率差异很大,存在广泛的地理、种族和社会经济因素差异。共同决策方法要求患者和医生之间进行信息交流,有助于提高患者对治疗决策的满意度和 TJA 的合理使用。
问题/假设:将基于证据的结果数据与患者对健康状况的个人偏好和支付意愿纳入预期价值决策分析模型,用于共同决策模型中,将提高髋或膝关节骨关节炎患者的满意度,并导致 TJA 的更合理使用。
髋或膝关节骨关节炎患者将被随机分配至常规护理或参与共同决策干预。共同决策干预组的患者将使用时间权衡技术测量他们对与骨关节炎和 TJA 相关的个人健康状况的偏好,并将这些值纳入预期价值决策分析模型中,该模型还将纳入患者对特定治疗干预的支付意愿和基于证据的结果概率。将使用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼秩和检验比较手术与非手术治疗的患者决策和他们对决策的满意度。
关于患者对特定健康状况的偏好和支付意愿的信息可以与预期价值决策分析模型中的基于证据的结果数据相结合,这将有助于在髋或膝关节骨关节炎患者的外科医生与其之间进行共同临床决策。