• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[手部外科系统评价主题的优先级排序。专家调查结果]

[Prioritisation of topics for systematic reviews in hand surgery. Results of an expert survey].

作者信息

Schädel-Höpfner M, Diener M K, Eisenschenk A, Lögters T, Windolf J

机构信息

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Unfall- und Handchirurgie, Moorenstrasse 5, Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011 Feb;43(1):15-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267935. Epub 2010 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1055/s-0030-1267935
PMID:21161876
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Systematic reviews are fundamental decision-making tools for the assessment of the effectiveness of healthcare interventions and for determining future research fields. In the field of hand surgery, so far, there exists only a limited number of systematic reviews. According to the diversity and multitude of hand surgical topics, relevant fields for systematic reviews were identified by means of an expert ranking.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A catalogue of 24 topics was extracted from publications of representative hand surgical journals. These topics were categorized and integrated into a questionnaire which was presented to 30 experts in the field of hand surgery. Every single topic had to be rated by marks from 1 (very relevant) to 5 (not relevant). Further topics could have been indicated. Averaging of the marks allowed to define a ranking and a prioritisation of the topics.

RESULTS

29 of 30 questionnaires were returned. The ranking showed scapholunate ligament injury, Kienboeck's disease and scaphoid nonunion to have the highest relevance, followed by 5 other topics dealing with wrist problems. The lowest relevance was attributed to neck fractures of the fifth metacarpal, ulnar collateral ligament injury of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint and postoperative management following replantation.

CONCLUSION

The results of the presented survey allow for a prioritisation of topics for systematic reviews in hand surgery. The ranking of the topics emphasises the particular relevance of injuries and diseases of the wrist.

摘要

背景

系统评价是评估医疗保健干预措施有效性和确定未来研究领域的基本决策工具。在手部外科领域,到目前为止,仅存在数量有限的系统评价。根据手部外科主题的多样性和众多性,通过专家排名确定了系统评价的相关领域。

材料与方法

从代表性手部外科期刊的出版物中提取了24个主题的目录。这些主题被分类并整合到一份问卷中,该问卷被提交给30位手部外科领域的专家。每个主题都必须用1(非常相关)到5(不相关)的分数进行评分。也可以指出其他主题。对分数进行平均可以确定主题的排名和优先级。

结果

30份问卷中有29份被返回。排名显示舟月韧带损伤、月骨无菌性坏死和舟骨不愈合的相关性最高,其次是其他5个涉及腕部问题的主题。相关性最低的是第五掌骨颈部骨折、拇指掌指关节尺侧副韧带损伤和再植术后的管理。

结论

本次调查结果有助于确定手部外科系统评价主题的优先级。主题排名强调了腕部损伤和疾病的特殊相关性。

相似文献

1
[Prioritisation of topics for systematic reviews in hand surgery. Results of an expert survey].[手部外科系统评价主题的优先级排序。专家调查结果]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011 Feb;43(1):15-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1267935. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
2
[Treatment errors in hand surgery. Comparison criteria for education in hand surgery and additional training in hand surgery based on error statistics of Chamber of Medicine, North Rhine-Westphalia].[手外科治疗失误。基于北莱茵-威斯特法伦州医学协会失误统计的手外科教育比较标准及手外科额外培训]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2011 Feb;43(1):9-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1269903. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
3
[The importance of arthroscopy for hand surgery today].[关节镜检查在当今手部外科手术中的重要性]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1992 Nov;24(6):296-303.
4
[Distally pedicled posterior interosseous artery flap for the coverage of defects on the wrist and hand].带蒂远端骨间后动脉皮瓣修复腕手部缺损
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2008 Jun;20(2):111-8. doi: 10.1007/s00064-008-1234-x.
5
Evidence-based hand surgery: the role of Cochrane reviews.循证手外科:Cochrane系统评价的作用。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Apr;33(2):110-7. doi: 10.1177/1753193407087510.
6
There is inadequate evidence to determine the effectiveness of nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions for hand osteoarthritis: an overview of high-quality systematic reviews.没有足够的证据来确定非药物和非手术干预措施对手骨关节炎的有效性:高质量系统评价综述。
Phys Ther. 2009 Dec;89(12):1363-70. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080398. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
7
What's New in Hand and Wrist Surgery.手部与腕部外科的新进展
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Mar 18;102(6):453-459. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01333.
8
Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.基于循证管理的系统评价:如何查找以及如何运用它们。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 1):806-12.
9
[Our position with respect to anesthesia in reconstructive surgery of the wrist].[我们对手腕重建手术中麻醉的立场]
Ortop Travmatol Protez. 1971 Oct;32(10):19-22.
10
Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.系统评价:一项关于位置和被引频次的横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2003 Nov 24;1:2. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-1-2.

引用本文的文献

1
[Therapy of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions].[三角纤维软骨复合体损伤的治疗]
Unfallchirurg. 2012 Jul;115(7):582-8. doi: 10.1007/s00113-012-2176-1.
2
[Current concepts in the treatment of mallet fractures of the distal phalanx].[远节指骨锤状指骨折治疗的当前概念]
Unfallchirurg. 2011 Jul;114(7):591-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-011-2010-1.