• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较重量级和轻量级赛艇运动员的力量相关表现指标。

Comparison of force-related performance indicators between heavyweight and lightweight rowers.

机构信息

Western Australian Institute of Sport, Mt. Claremont, Australia.

出版信息

Sports Biomech. 2010 Sep;9(3):178-92. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2010.511678.

DOI:10.1080/14763141.2010.511678
PMID:21162363
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine biomechanical variables relating to the force production of men's Lightweight (LW) and Heavyweight (HW) rowing pairs. Seven HW and seven LW coxless pairs were studied under a range of stroke rates, from 20 spm to race rating (average of 33.7 spm for the HWs and 33.9 spm for the LWs). Each crew was equipped with biomechanical apparatus allowing the measurement of gate force, horizontal oar angle, and boat velocity. The HW crews exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.05) values for all variables examined, at all rates. Peak handle force was 26.2% to 30.2% higher in the HW group. Average handle force ranged from 18.7% to 22.1% higher than the LW group. Work per stroke was found to be 26% to 28% higher for the HW crews, and Power Per Kilogram was also greater for the HW crews, from 24.0% to 29.2%. The LWs were observed to be consistently, but not significantly, slower than the HWs (from 96.9% at the race situation, to 98.7% at 28 spm). These observations are important when considering biomechanical performance indicators in rowing, as significant changes in performance indicators may lead to only minimal alteration in boat velocity.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨与男子轻量级(LW)和重量级(HW)赛艇双人艇划桨力量产生相关的生物力学变量。在 20 个划桨频率至比赛评级(HW 的平均频率为 33.7 个,LW 的平均频率为 33.9 个)的范围内,对七对 HW 和七对 LW 无舵双人艇进行了研究。每支队伍都配备了生物力学仪器,可测量桨架力、水平桨角和船速。HW 艇手在所有测试速度下的所有变量都表现出显著更高的(p < 0.05)值。HW 组的桨手峰值手柄力高出 26.2%至 30.2%。平均手柄力比 LW 组高出 18.7%至 22.1%。HW 组的每次划桨做功量比 LW 组高 26%至 28%,而每公斤功率也比 LW 组高,从 24.0%到 29.2%。LW 组的船速始终比 HW 组慢,但没有显著差异(从比赛情况下的 96.9%到 28 个划桨频率时的 98.7%)。这些观察结果在考虑划船的生物力学表现指标时很重要,因为表现指标的显著变化可能只会导致船速的微小改变。

相似文献

1
Comparison of force-related performance indicators between heavyweight and lightweight rowers.比较重量级和轻量级赛艇运动员的力量相关表现指标。
Sports Biomech. 2010 Sep;9(3):178-92. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2010.511678.
2
The impact of fluctuations in boat velocity during the rowing cycle on race time.划桨周期中船速波动对比赛时间的影响。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009 Aug;19(4):585-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00819.x. Epub 2008 May 27.
3
Assessment of propulsive pin force and oar angle time-series using functional data analysis in on-water rowing.在水上划船运动中,运用功能数据分析评估推进销力和桨叶角度时间序列。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Dec;27(12):1688-1696. doi: 10.1111/sms.12871. Epub 2017 May 12.
4
Effect of Rowing Ergometer Compliance on Biomechanical and Physiological Indicators during Simulated 2,000-metre Race.赛艇测功仪顺应性对模拟 2000 米比赛中生物力学和生理学指标的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Jun 1;18(2):264-270. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Factors of Rowing Ergometer Performance in High-Level Female Rowers.高水平女子赛艇运动员赛艇测功仪成绩的影响因素。
Int J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;38(13):1023-1028. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118849. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
6
Rocking the boat: does perfect rowing crew synchronization reduce detrimental boat movements?扰乱局面:完美的赛艇队员同步能否减少不利的艇身晃动?
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Dec;27(12):1697-1704. doi: 10.1111/sms.12800. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Strapping rowers to their sliding seat improves performance during the start of single-scull rowing.在单人双桨赛艇出发阶段,将划手固定在滑动座椅上可提高比赛成绩。
J Sports Sci. 2016 Sep;34(17):1643-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1130235. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
Optimisation of the mean boat velocity in rowing.赛艇平均艇速的优化
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012;15(8):815-24. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2011.561794. Epub 2011 May 24.
9
Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers.新手、优秀和精英赛艇运动员生物力学差异的判别分析。
J Sports Sci. 1995 Oct;13(5):377-85. doi: 10.1080/02640419508732253.
10
How gender and boat-side affect shape characteristics of force-angle profiles in single sculling: Insights from functional data analysis.性别和艇边位置如何影响单桨划艇力角曲线的形态特征:来自功能数据分析的见解。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):533-537. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiological Demands Across Exercise Intensity Domains in Rowing: Implications of Weight Category and Sex Differences.划船运动中不同运动强度领域的生理需求:体重类别和性别差异的影响
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jul 25;13(8):245. doi: 10.3390/sports13080245.
2
On-water Rowing Biomechanical Assessment: A Systematic Scoping Review.水上划船生物力学评估:一项系统的范围综述
Sports Med Open. 2024 Sep 27;10(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00760-2.
3
A case report on dietary needs of the rowing athlete winner of the triple crown.关于三冠王赛艇运动员饮食需求的病例报告。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 21;10(17):e36551. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36551. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
4
Using Wearable Sensors to Estimate Mechanical Power Output in Cyclical Sports Other than Cycling-A Review.使用可穿戴传感器估算除骑行以外的周期性运动中的机械功率输出 - 综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 21;23(1):50. doi: 10.3390/s23010050.
5
Over 50 Years of Researching Force Profiles in Rowing: What Do We Know?划船运动中力的特征研究:50 多年来我们都了解了什么?
Sports Med. 2018 Dec;48(12):2703-2714. doi: 10.1007/s40279-018-0992-3.