Department of Neurology, UMASS/Memorial Healthcare, Worcester, MA 01545, USA.
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1 Suppl):S24-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592394. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
All prior drug development programs of neuroprotective agents were unsuccessful for a variety of reasons related to both preclinical assessment and the design/implementation of clinical trials. The neuroprotection hypothesis of improving functional outcome related to salvaging ischemic brain tissue is strongly supported by robust preclinical data for many agents. In the future, monotherapy neuroprotection trials will be difficult but could be performed in underused centers with drugs that have very promising and complete preclinical results. Additional approaches for the testing and use of neuroprotective agents should be considered. Novel approaches would include extending penumbral survival for the later use of reperfusion therapy, reducing reperfusion injury after successful reperfusion, and using drugs with both neuroprotective and recovery enhancing effects, as exemplified by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and citicoline. To maximize outcome after stroke, the combined use or reperfusion and neuroprotection is likely to be needed, so we must begin to perform carefully designed trials with this combination.
由于临床前评估和临床试验设计/实施方面的各种原因,先前所有的神经保护剂药物开发项目都以失败告终。许多药物的强有力的临床前数据强烈支持了通过挽救缺血性脑组织来改善与功能结果相关的神经保护假说。未来,单药神经保护试验将很困难,但可以在使用具有非常有前途和完整临床前结果的药物的未充分利用的中心进行。应考虑神经保护剂的测试和使用的其他方法。新方法将包括延长半影区的存活时间,以便以后使用再灌注治疗,减少成功再灌注后的再灌注损伤,以及使用具有神经保护和恢复增强作用的药物,粒细胞集落刺激因子和胞磷胆碱就是例证。为了使中风后的结果最大化,可能需要联合使用再灌注和神经保护,因此我们必须开始用这种组合进行精心设计的试验。