• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.TVT-SECUR®与MONARC®手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及满意度比较
Korean J Urol. 2010 Nov;51(11):767-71. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.767. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
2
Randomized controlled study of MONARC® vs. tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O®) in the treatment of female urinary incontinence: comparison of 3-year cure rates.MONARC®与无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O®)治疗女性尿失禁的随机对照研究:3年治愈率比较
Korean J Urol. 2012 Apr;53(4):258-62. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.4.258. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
3
Efficacy and safety of the TVT-SECUR® and impact on quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence: a 2-year follow-up.TVT-SECUR®治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效与安全性及其对患者生活质量的影响:一项为期2年的随访研究
Korean J Urol. 2011 May;52(5):335-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.5.335. Epub 2011 May 24.
4
One-Year Surgical Outcomes and Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Sling Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: TVT SECUR(R) vs. CureMesh(R).微创吊带手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的一年手术效果及生活质量:TVT SECUR(R)与CureMesh(R)对比
Korean J Urol. 2010 May;51(5):337-43. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.5.337. Epub 2010 May 19.
5
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
6
The efficacy and safety comparison of surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence: A network meta-analysis.手术治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效和安全性比较:网络荟萃分析。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Apr;37(4):1199-1211. doi: 10.1002/nau.23468. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
7
Comparison between tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape in treating stress urinary incontinence after vaginal mesh surgery.无张力阴道吊带术与经闭孔吊带术治疗阴道网片手术后压力性尿失禁的比较
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;57(4):528-531. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.06.008.
8
A multi-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach versus the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free, suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study.一项多中心随机临床对照试验,比较耻骨后(RP)入路与经闭孔入路(TO)用于无张力尿道下吊带治疗尿动力学压力性尿失禁:TORP研究。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Feb;19(2):171-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-007-0412-y. Epub 2007 Jul 19.
9
Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)与单切口无张力阴道吊带(Ajust™)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较:一项为期1年的随访随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
10
Transobturator vaginal tape in comparison to tension-free vaginal tape: A prospective trial with a minimum 12 months follow-up.经闭孔阴道吊带与无张力阴道吊带的比较:一项至少随访12个月的前瞻性试验。
Indian J Urol. 2009 Jul;25(3):321-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.56183.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Tension-Free Vaginal Tape-Secur Mini-Sling Versus Standard Midurethral Slings for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.无张力阴道吊带术-安全迷你吊带与标准中段尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Neurourol J. 2015 Dec;19(4):246-58. doi: 10.5213/inj.2015.19.4.246. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
2
Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.女性盆底重建手术中的网片并发症及其处理:一项系统评价。
Indian J Urol. 2012 Apr;28(2):129-53. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.98453.
3
Variation of distances from mid-urethra to the obturator foramen: an MRI study.从尿道中段到闭孔的距离变化:一项MRI研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Aug;23(8):1075-80. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1735-x. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
4
Randomized controlled study of MONARC® vs. tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O®) in the treatment of female urinary incontinence: comparison of 3-year cure rates.MONARC®与无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O®)治疗女性尿失禁的随机对照研究:3年治愈率比较
Korean J Urol. 2012 Apr;53(4):258-62. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.4.258. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
5
TVT-Secur (Hammock) versus TVT-Obturator: a randomized trial of suburethral sling operative procedures.TVT-Secur(吊床式)与TVT-闭孔术:一项尿道下吊带手术操作的随机试验
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):41-5. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31823bdbcf.
6
Retropubic and transobturator slings: still useful or should all patients be treated with mini-slings?经耻骨后和经闭孔吊带:仍有作用还是所有患者均应采用迷你吊带治疗?
Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Oct;12(5):316-22. doi: 10.1007/s11934-011-0200-6.
7
Efficacy and safety of the TVT-SECUR® and impact on quality of life in women with stress urinary incontinence: a 2-year follow-up.TVT-SECUR®治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效与安全性及其对患者生活质量的影响:一项为期2年的随访研究
Korean J Urol. 2011 May;52(5):335-9. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.5.335. Epub 2011 May 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Comparative Study of the U- and H-Type Approaches of the TVT-Secur Procedure for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Follow-Up.
Korean J Urol. 2010 Apr;51(4):250-6. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.4.250. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
2
A prospective multicenter randomized comparative study between the U- and H-type methods of the TVT SECUR procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up.U 型和 H 型经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术(TVT-SECUR)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的前瞻性多中心随机对照研究:1 年随访。
Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.018. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
3
Initial experience with a short, tension-free vaginal tape (the tension-free vaginal tape secur system).
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Apr;143(2):121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
4
[Our experience with mini tapes (TVT Secur and MiniArc) in the surgery for stress urinary incontinence].[我们在压力性尿失禁手术中使用迷你吊带(TVT Secur和MiniArc)的经验]
Actas Urol Esp. 2008 Nov-Dec;32(10):1013-8. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(08)73980-9.
5
TVT-secur: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. One year data from a multi-centre prospective trial.TVT-secur:一种治疗原发性压力性尿失禁的微创手术。一项多中心前瞻性试验的一年数据。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Mar;20(3):313-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0772-y. Epub 2008 Nov 27.
6
Perioperative complications and early follow-up with 100 TVT-SECUR procedures.100例经闭孔无张力尿道中段悬吊带术的围手术期并发症及早期随访
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 Jul-Aug;15(4):480-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.04.006. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
7
[TVT Secur: more and more minimally invasive. Preliminary prospective study of 110 cases].[经闭孔无张力尿道中段悬吊带术:越来越微创。110例初步前瞻性研究]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2008 May;37(3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
8
Retropubic compared with transobturator tape placement in treatment of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial.耻骨后与经闭孔吊带置入治疗尿失禁的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):4-11. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249607.82768.a1.
9
Trans-obturator urethral sling for the surgical correction of female stress urinary incontinence: outside-in (Monarc) versus inside-out (TVT-O). Are the two ways reassuring?经闭孔尿道悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的手术矫正:由外向内(Monarc)与由内向外(TVT-O)。两种方法是否可靠?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Aug;133(2):232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.05.015. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
10
Comparison of retropubic and outside-in transoburator sling systems for the cure of female genuine stress urinary incontinence.
Eur Urol. 2005 Nov;48(5):799-804. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.07.019. Epub 2005 Aug 15.

TVT-SECUR®与MONARC®手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及满意度比较

Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.

作者信息

Jeong Moo Youl, Kim Su Jin, Kim Hyo Sin, Koh Jun Sung, Kim Joon Chul

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Catholic University of Korea, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Urol. 2010 Nov;51(11):767-71. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.767. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

DOI:10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.767
PMID:21165197
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2991574/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The tension-free vaginal tape SECUR® (TVT-S) is a new, minimally invasive sling procedure for treating female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, results of comparisons of the TVT-S with the transobturator tape (TOT) sling are lacking. Therefore, we investigated outcome and satisfaction of the TVT-S procedure compared with the TOT procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 64 patients with SUI who underwent the TVT-S (n=31) or TOT (MONARC®, n=33) procedure and were followed up for more than 1 year. The preoperative evaluation included history taking, pelvic examination, consecutive 3-day voiding diary, and urodynamic study including Valsalva leak point pressure. Postoperatively, continence status and subjective patient satisfaction were evaluated. Cure was defined as the absence of any episodes of involuntary urine leakage during stressful activities and a stress cough test.

RESULTS

The TVT-S group (71.0%) showed a slightly lower cure rate than did the MONARC group (84.8%); however, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p=0.179). Nine of the patients who underwent the TVT-S showed incontinence postoperatively. Among them, the H approach was used in 7 patients and the U approach was done in 2 patients. Following TVT-S and MONARC, the patients' reported satisfaction was 80.6% and 78.8%, respectively. Patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between the two groups (p=0.854).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that the TVT-S and MONARC procedures may be comparable in terms of cure rate and patient satisfaction after more than 1 year of follow-up.

摘要

目的

无张力阴道吊带SECUR®(TVT-S)是一种用于治疗女性压力性尿失禁(SUI)的新型微创吊带手术。然而,缺乏TVT-S与经闭孔吊带(TOT)的比较结果。因此,我们研究了TVT-S手术与TOT手术的疗效和患者满意度。

材料与方法

我们纳入了64例接受TVT-S手术(n = 31)或TOT手术(MONARC®,n = 33)且随访超过1年的SUI患者。术前评估包括病史采集、盆腔检查、连续3天的排尿日记以及包括瓦尔萨尔瓦漏尿点压力在内的尿动力学研究。术后评估控尿状态和患者主观满意度。治愈定义为在压力性活动和压力性咳嗽试验期间无任何非自愿性尿液漏出。

结果

TVT-S组(71.0%)的治愈率略低于MONARC组(84.8%);然而,两组之间无显著差异(p = 0.179)。接受TVT-S手术的9例患者术后出现尿失禁。其中,7例采用H入路,2例采用U入路。TVT-S和MONARC术后患者报告的满意度分别为80.6%和78.8%。两组患者的满意度无显著差异(p = 0.854)。

结论

我们的结果表明,在随访超过1年后,TVT-S和MONARC手术在治愈率和患者满意度方面可能具有可比性。