• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经耻骨后和经闭孔吊带:仍有作用还是所有患者均应采用迷你吊带治疗?

Retropubic and transobturator slings: still useful or should all patients be treated with mini-slings?

机构信息

Charlotte Continence Center, McKay Department of Urology, 1023 Edgehill Road South, Charlotte, NC 28207, USA.

出版信息

Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Oct;12(5):316-22. doi: 10.1007/s11934-011-0200-6.

DOI:10.1007/s11934-011-0200-6
PMID:21698397
Abstract

Traditional retropubic and transobturator midurethral slings are reliable, safe, and effective treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Unfortunately, they also are associated with rare but severe complications, such as bladder or bowel perforation, vascular injury, nerve damage, and/or groin muscle pain that can occur with the blind passage of trocars. To maintain efficacy and patient satisfaction while avoiding such complications, minimally invasive mini-slings have been developed. These smaller mini-slings can be placed through a single vaginal incision at the level of the midurethra without trocars. Mini-slings often are performed as an outpatient surgery, with minimal morbidity, pain, and quick patient recovery. With continued refinement and surgeon experience, mini-slings potentially may be performed safely in the office setting under local anesthesia while maintaining the efficacy of traditional slings.

摘要

传统经耻骨后和经闭孔尿道中段吊带术是治疗压力性尿失禁的可靠、安全和有效的方法。然而,它们也与罕见但严重的并发症相关,如膀胱或肠穿孔、血管损伤、神经损伤和/或腹股沟肌肉疼痛,这些并发症可能是由于盲目通过套管针引起的。为了在避免这些并发症的同时保持疗效和患者满意度,已经开发了微创迷你吊带术。这些较小的迷你吊带可以通过阴道中段的单个切口放置,而无需使用套管针。迷你吊带术通常作为门诊手术进行,具有最小的发病率、疼痛和快速的患者康复。随着不断的改进和外科医生的经验积累,迷你吊带术有可能在局麻下安全地在办公室环境中进行,同时保持传统吊带术的疗效。

相似文献

1
Retropubic and transobturator slings: still useful or should all patients be treated with mini-slings?经耻骨后和经闭孔吊带:仍有作用还是所有患者均应采用迷你吊带治疗?
Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Oct;12(5):316-22. doi: 10.1007/s11934-011-0200-6.
2
Midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence.用于压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;51(1):124-35. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318161e687.
3
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
4
Retropubic versus Transobturator Mid Urethral Slings in Patients at High Risk for Recurrent Stress Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经耻骨后与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗有复发性压力性尿失禁高危因素患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):132-142. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000222. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
5
Midurethral slings: which should I choose and what is the evidence for use?中段尿道吊带术:我该如何选择,使用的依据是什么?
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;27(5):359-65. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000202.
6
Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.更新的关于阴道中段悬吊带术、耻骨后尿道中段悬吊带术和经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):567-591. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.026. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Comparison of retropubic vs transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.耻骨后与经闭孔途径治疗中段尿道吊带术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;197(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.09.025.
8
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Stress Urinary Incontinence: Slings, Single-Incision Slings, and Nonmesh Approaches.压力性尿失禁:吊带、单切口吊带和非网片方法。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;48(3):449-466. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.05.002.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence.单切口迷你吊带(MiniArc)与经闭孔中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(14):e0283. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010283.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of female stress urinary incontinence treatments with adjustable single-incision mini-slings and transobturator tension-free vaginal tape surgeries.可调节单切口迷你吊带术与经闭孔无张力阴道吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的荟萃分析
BMC Urol. 2015 Jul 7;15:64. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0060-3.
2
Intraoperative Observation of the Degree and Pattern of Urine Leakage before Adjustment of the Mesh during a Transobturator Tape Procedure.经闭孔尿道中段无张力吊带手术中调整补片前尿液漏出程度及方式的术中观察
Chonnam Med J. 2014 Dec;50(3):91-5. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2014.50.3.91. Epub 2014 Dec 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O, TVT-Secur, and Mini-Arc: results at 12-month follow-up.探索性研究评估 TVT-O、TVT-Secur 和 Mini-Arc 的疗效和并发症:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2011 Jun;59(6):940-4. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.018. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
2
Single incision mid-urethral sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.经阴道单切口尿道中段吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁。
Urology. 2011 Feb;77(2):321-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.07.538. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
3
Comparison of Efficacy and Satisfaction between the TVT-SECUR® and MONARC® Procedures for the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
TVT-SECUR®与MONARC®手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效及满意度比较
Korean J Urol. 2010 Nov;51(11):767-71. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.767. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
4
Comparison of three kinds of mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.三种经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较
Urologia. 2010 Jan-Mar;77(1):37-41; discussion 42.
5
Comparison of the TVT SECUR System "hammock" and "U" tape positions for management of stress urinary incontinence.TVT SECUR 系统“吊床”与“U”型带位置对比用于治疗压力性尿失禁。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Dec;111(3):233-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
6
Short-term outcomes with the Ajust™ system: a new single incision sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.Ajust™ 系统的短期疗效:一种用于治疗压力性尿失禁的新型单切口吊带
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Feb;22(2):177-82. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1254-6. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
7
A comparative study of outside-in and inside-out transobturator tape procedures for stress urinary incontinence.经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的对比研究。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;70(3):200-5. doi: 10.1159/000318866. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
8
Prospective evaluation of a single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.经阴道单切口吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的前瞻性评估。
J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
9
Complications of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for stress urinary incontinence.无张力阴道吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁的并发症
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Nov;21(11):1353-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1210-5. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Transobturator TVT-O versus retropubic TVT: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial at 24 months follow-up.经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术与耻骨后无张力尿道中段吊带术:一项多中心随机对照试验24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Nov;21(11):1337-45. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1196-z. Epub 2010 Jun 16.