Kim Boram, Moon Seong-Hwan, Moon Eun-Su, Kim Hak-Sun, Park Jin-Oh, Cho In-Je, Lee Hwan-Mo
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Asian Spine J. 2010 Dec;4(2):71-6. doi: 10.4184/asj.2010.4.2.71. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
This is a prospective randomized cohort study.
We intended to evaluate the efficacy of a 48 hour antibiotic microbial prophylaxis (AMP) protocol as compared with a 72 hour AMP protocol.
The current guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection (SSI) suggests the AMP should not exceed 24 hours after clean surgery like spinal surgery. But there exist some confusion in real clinical practice about the duration of postoperative antibiotic administration because the evidence of the guideline was not robust.
The subjects were 548 patients who underwent spinal surgery at our department from April 2007 to December 2008. The patients were classified into two groups according to the prophylaxis protocol: group A, for which AMP was employed for 72 hours postoperatively and group B, for which AMP was employed for 48 hours postoperatively. Five hundred two patients out of 548 patients were followed until 6 months postoperatively. The incidence of SSI in the two groups was analyzed.
The overall infection rate was 0.8%. There was no significant difference in infection rate between the two groups. The overall infection rate for the patients who underwent instrumented fusion was 0.9%. There was no significant difference in the infection rate between the patients of the two groups who underwent instrumented fusion.
AMP for 48 hours is as efficient as AMP for 72 hours.
这是一项前瞻性随机队列研究。
我们旨在评估48小时抗生素微生物预防(AMP)方案与72小时AMP方案相比的疗效。
目前预防手术部位感染(SSI)的指南建议,像脊柱手术这样的清洁手术后,AMP不应超过24小时。但在实际临床实践中,关于术后抗生素使用时长存在一些困惑,因为该指南的证据并不充分。
研究对象为2007年4月至2008年12月在我科接受脊柱手术的548例患者。根据预防方案将患者分为两组:A组,术后使用AMP 72小时;B组,术后使用AMP 48小时。548例患者中有502例患者被随访至术后6个月。分析两组患者的SSI发生率。
总体感染率为0.8%。两组之间的感染率无显著差异。接受器械融合手术患者的总体感染率为0.9%。接受器械融合手术的两组患者之间的感染率无显著差异。
48小时的AMP与72小时的AMP效果相同。