Adele Houghton Consulting, Austin, TX, USA.
HERD. 2009 Summer;2(4):10-45. doi: 10.1177/193758670900200402.
This study assesses the extent of "first-cost green building construction premiums" in the healthcare sector based on data submitted by and interviews with 13 current LEED-certified and LEED-registered healthcare project teams, coupled with a literature survey of articles on the topics of actual and perceived first-cost premiums associated with green building strategies. This analysis covers both perceived and realized costs across a range of projects in this sector, leading to the following conclusions: Construction first-cost premiums may be lower than is generally perceived, and they appear to be independent of both building size and level of "green" achievement; projects are using financial incentives and philanthropy to drive higher levels of achievement; premiums are decreasing over time; and projects are benefiting from improvements in health and productivity which, although difficult to monetize, are universally valued.
本研究基于对 13 个当前 LEED 认证和注册的医疗保健项目团队提交的数据和访谈,并结合有关绿色建筑策略相关实际和感知的初始成本溢价的文章的文献调查,评估了医疗保健领域“初始成本绿色建筑溢价”的程度。 该分析涵盖了该领域内一系列项目的感知和实际成本,得出以下结论:建筑初始成本溢价可能低于普遍认知,并且似乎与建筑规模和“绿色”成就水平无关;项目正在利用财务激励和慈善捐款来推动更高的成就水平;溢价随时间的推移而降低;并且项目受益于健康和生产力的提高,尽管难以货币化,但普遍受到重视。