Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Department of Urology, Bucharest, Romania.
Urology. 2011 Apr;77(4):849-54. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.062. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly introduced endoscopic technique in the treatment of nonmuscle-invasive bladder tumors (NMIBT), the bipolar plasma vaporization of bladder tumors (BPV-BT), and to compare it with monopolar transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT).
A total of 120 patients with at least one bladder tumor larger than 3 cm were enrolled in the study and randomized for BPV-BT and TURBT. Resection biopsy followed by tumor plasma vaporization and biopsies of the tumoral bed were performed in the 60 cases of the BPV-BT arm. All NMIBT patients underwent monopolar Re-TURBT 4 weeks after the initial procedure.
The mean operative time and postoperative hemoglobin decrease were significantly improved for BPV-BT compared with TURBT (21.4 minutes vs 32.7 minutes and 0.3 g/dL vs 0.9 g/dL). The perioperative complications were more frequent in the TURBT arm. The mean catheterization period and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the BPV-BT series (2.5 vs 3.5 days and 3.5 vs 4.5 days). During follow-up, the overall residual tumors' rate at Re-TURBT was 9.3% in the BPVBT group vs 20.8% in the TURBT group. Primary site recurrences occurred in 7.4% vs 17% of the cases, whereas in patients with initial multiple tumors, the recurrence rate was 9.7% vs 25%.
BPV-BT seems to represent a promising endoscopic treatment alternative for NMIBT patients, with good efficacy, reduced morbidity, fast postoperative recovery, and significantly decreased residual tumors' rate by compared with TURBT.
评估一种新引入的内镜技术(膀胱肿瘤双极等离子汽化术,BPV-BT)治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBT)的疗效和安全性,并将其与经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)进行比较。
共纳入 120 例至少有一个大于 3cm 的膀胱肿瘤的患者,并随机分为 BPV-BT 组和 TURBT 组。BPV-BT 组的 60 例患者在肿瘤等离子汽化和肿瘤床活检后进行肿瘤切除活检。所有 NMIBT 患者在初始手术后 4 周行单极 Re-TURBT。
与 TURBT 相比,BPV-BT 的平均手术时间和术后血红蛋白下降明显改善(21.4 分钟比 32.7 分钟和 0.3g/dL 比 0.9g/dL)。TURBT 组的围手术期并发症更为频繁。BPV-BT 组的平均导尿管留置时间和住院时间明显更短(2.5 天比 3.5 天和 3.5 天比 4.5 天)。在随访期间,Re-TURBT 时 BPV-BT 组的总体残留肿瘤率为 9.3%,而 TURBT 组为 20.8%。初发肿瘤部位复发率分别为 7.4%和 17%,而初发多发肿瘤患者的复发率分别为 9.7%和 25%。
BPV-BT 似乎是 NMIBT 患者一种有前途的内镜治疗选择,与 TURBT 相比,具有良好的疗效、较低的发病率、术后快速恢复和明显降低的残留肿瘤率。