Dept. of Medical Informatics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Feb;80(2):81-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) should be seamlessly integrated with existing clinical information systems to enable automatic provision of advice at the time and place where decisions are made. It has been suggested that a lack of agreed data standards frequently hampers this integration. We performed a literature review to investigate whether CDSSs used standardized (i.e. coded or numerical) data and which terminological systems have been used to code data. We also investigated whether a lack of standardized data was considered an impediment for CDSS implementation.
Articles reporting an evaluation of a CDSS that provided a computerized advice based on patient-specific data items were identified based on a former literature review on CDSS and on CDSS studies identified in AMIA's 'Year in Review'. Authors of these articles were contacted to check and complete the extracted data. A questionnaire among the authors of included studies was used to determine the obstacles in CDSS implementation.
We identified 77 articles published between 1995 and 2008. Twenty-two percent of the evaluated CDSSs used only numerical data. Fifty one percent of the CDSSs that used coded data applied an international terminology. The most frequently used international terminology were the ICD (International Classification of Diseases), used in 68% of the cases and LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes) in 12% of the cases. More than half of the authors experienced barriers in CDSS implementation. In most cases these barriers were related to the lack of electronically available standardized data required to invoke or activate the CDSS.
Many CDSSs applied different terminological systems to code data. This diversity hampers the possibility of sharing and reasoning with data within different systems. The results of the survey confirm the hypothesis that data standardization is a critical success factor for CDSS development.
临床决策支持系统(CDSS)应与现有的临床信息系统无缝集成,以便在做出决策的时间和地点自动提供建议。有人认为,缺乏商定的数据标准经常阻碍这种集成。我们进行了文献回顾,以调查 CDSS 是否使用标准化(即编码或数字)数据,以及使用了哪些术语系统对数据进行编码。我们还调查了缺乏标准化数据是否被认为是 CDSS 实施的障碍。
根据以前关于 CDSS 的文献综述以及在 AMIA 的“年度回顾”中确定的 CDSS 研究,确定了报告评估基于患者特定数据项提供计算机化建议的 CDSS 的文章。联系这些文章的作者以检查和完成提取的数据。对纳入研究的作者进行问卷调查,以确定 CDSS 实施中的障碍。
我们确定了 1995 年至 2008 年期间发表的 77 篇文章。评估的 CDSS 中有 22%仅使用数字数据。使用编码数据的 CDSS 中有 51%应用了国际术语。使用最频繁的国际术语是 ICD(国际疾病分类),在 68%的情况下使用,LOINC(逻辑观察标识符名称和代码)在 12%的情况下使用。超过一半的作者在 CDSS 实施过程中遇到了障碍。在大多数情况下,这些障碍与缺乏可用于调用或激活 CDSS 的电子可用标准化数据有关。
许多 CDSS 应用了不同的术语系统对数据进行编码。这种多样性阻碍了在不同系统中共享和推理数据的可能性。调查结果证实了这样一个假设,即数据标准化是 CDSS 开发的关键成功因素。