• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜检查镇静期间的自主神经反应及其与临床医生满意度的关系。

Autonomous Nervous Response During Sedation in Colonoscopy and the Relationship With Clinician Satisfaction.

作者信息

Hann Alexander, Gruss Sascha, Goetze Sebastian, Mehlhase Niklas, Frisch Stephan, Walter Benjamin, Walter Steffen

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Gastroenterology, University Hospital Wurzburg, Wurzburg, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 16;8:643158. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.643158. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.643158
PMID:34222272
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8242168/
Abstract

Nurse assisted propofol sedation (NAPS) is a common method used for colonoscopies. It is safe and widely accepted by patients. Little is known, however, about the satisfaction of clinicians performing colonoscopies with NAPS and the factors that negatively influence this perception such as observer-reported pain events. In this study, we aimed to correlate observer-reported pain events with the clinicians' satisfaction with the procedure. Additionally, we aimed to identify patient biosignals from the autonomic nervous system (B-ANS) during an endoscopy that correlate with those pain events. Consecutive patients scheduled for a colonoscopy with NAPS were prospectively recruited. During the procedure, observer-reported pain events, which included movements and paralinguistic sounds, were simultaneously recorded with different B-ANS (facial electromyogram (EMG), skin conductance level, body temperature and electrocardiogram). After the procedure, the examiners filled out the Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI). The primary endpoint was the correlation between CSSI and observer-reported pain events. The second primary endpoint was the identification of B-ANS that make it possible to predict those events. Secondary endpoints included the correlation between CSSI and sedation depth, the frequency and dose of sedative use, polyps resected, resection time, the duration of the procedure, the time it took to reach the coecum and the experience of the nurse performing the NAPS. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03860779. 112 patients with 98 (88.5%) available B-ANS recordings were prospectively recruited. There was a significant correlation between an increased number of observer-reported pain events during an endoscopy with NAPS and a lower CSSI ( = -0.318, = 0.001). Additionally, the EMG-signal from facial muscles correlated best with the event time points, and the signal significantly exceeded the baseline 30 s prior to the occurrence of paralinguistic sounds. The secondary endpoints showed that the propofol dose relative to the procedure time, the cecal intubation time, the time spent on polyp removal and the individual nurse performing the NAPS significantly correlated with CSSI. This study shows that movements and paralinguistic sounds during an endoscopy negatively correlate with the satisfaction of the examiner measured with the CSSI. Additionally, an EMG of the facial muscles makes it possible to identify such events and potentially predict their occurrence.

摘要

护士辅助丙泊酚镇静(NAPS)是结肠镜检查常用的方法。它安全且被患者广泛接受。然而,对于实施结肠镜检查的临床医生对NAPS的满意度以及诸如观察者报告的疼痛事件等对这种认知产生负面影响的因素知之甚少。在本研究中,我们旨在将观察者报告的疼痛事件与临床医生对该操作的满意度相关联。此外,我们旨在识别在内镜检查期间来自自主神经系统(B-ANS)的与这些疼痛事件相关的患者生物信号。前瞻性招募了计划接受NAPS结肠镜检查的连续患者。在操作过程中,观察者报告的疼痛事件,包括动作和副语言声音,与不同的B-ANS(面部肌电图(EMG)、皮肤电导水平、体温和心电图)同时记录。操作结束后,检查人员填写镇静临床医生满意度量表(CSSI)。主要终点是CSSI与观察者报告的疼痛事件之间的相关性。第二个主要终点是识别能够预测这些事件的B-ANS。次要终点包括CSSI与镇静深度、镇静剂使用频率和剂量、切除的息肉、切除时间、操作持续时间以及到达盲肠所需时间和实施NAPS的护士经验之间的相关性。ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03860779。前瞻性招募了112例患者,其中98例(88.5%)有可用的B-ANS记录。在内镜检查期间,NAPS中观察者报告的疼痛事件数量增加与较低的CSSI之间存在显著相关性(r = -0.318,P = 0.001)。此外,面部肌肉的EMG信号与事件时间点相关性最佳,并且该信号在副语言声音出现前30秒显著超过基线。次要终点表明,相对于操作时间的丙泊酚剂量、盲肠插管时间、息肉切除时间以及实施NAPS的个体护士与CSSI显著相关。本研究表明,内镜检查期间的动作和副语言声音与通过CSSI测量的检查人员满意度呈负相关。此外,面部肌肉的EMG能够识别此类事件并有可能预测其发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a911/8242168/8973fbe9cab0/fmed-08-643158-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a911/8242168/3a69ce8fa0da/fmed-08-643158-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a911/8242168/99381061deaa/fmed-08-643158-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a911/8242168/8973fbe9cab0/fmed-08-643158-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a911/8242168/3a69ce8fa0da/fmed-08-643158-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a911/8242168/99381061deaa/fmed-08-643158-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a911/8242168/8973fbe9cab0/fmed-08-643158-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Autonomous Nervous Response During Sedation in Colonoscopy and the Relationship With Clinician Satisfaction.结肠镜检查镇静期间的自主神经反应及其与临床医生满意度的关系。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 16;8:643158. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.643158. eCollection 2021.
2
The First US Clinical Experience With Computer-Assisted Propofol Sedation: A Retrospective Observational Comparative Study on Efficacy, Safety, Efficiency, and Endoscopist and Patient Satisfaction.美国首例计算机辅助丙泊酚镇静临床经验:一项关于疗效、安全性、效率以及内镜医师和患者满意度的回顾性观察比较研究
Anesth Analg. 2017 Sep;125(3):804-811. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001898.
3
Development and validation of the patient and clinician sedation satisfaction index for colonoscopy and upper endoscopy.结肠镜检查和上消化道内镜检查患者及临床医生镇静满意度指数的开发与验证
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Feb;7(2):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.09.004. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
4
Nurse-administered propofol-alfentanil sedation using a patient-controlled analgesia pump compared with opioid-benzodiazepine sedation for outpatient colonoscopy.使用患者自控镇痛泵由护士给予丙泊酚-阿芬太尼镇静与使用阿片类药物-苯二氮䓬类药物镇静用于门诊结肠镜检查的比较。
Endoscopy. 2009 Jun;41(6):522-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214711. Epub 2009 May 13.
5
Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial.护士给予丙泊酚镇静与咪达唑仑和哌替啶用于超声内镜检查的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):499-509. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.02.092. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
6
Propofol and non-propofol based sedation for outpatient colonoscopy-prospective comparison of depth of sedation using an EEG based SEDLine monitor.门诊结肠镜检查中丙泊酚与非丙泊酚镇静——使用基于脑电图的SEDLine监测仪对镇静深度进行前瞻性比较
J Clin Monit Comput. 2016 Oct;30(5):551-7. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9769-5. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
7
Registered nurse-administered propofol sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: Why? When? How?注册护士实施的异丙酚用于上消化道内镜检查和结肠镜检查的镇静:为何?何时?如何?
Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2003 Spring;3(2):70-80.
8
Safety of nurse-administered propofol sedation using PCA pump for outpatient colonoscopy in Chinese patients: a pilot study.中国患者门诊结肠镜检查中使用PCA泵由护士给予丙泊酚镇静的安全性:一项试点研究。
Asian J Surg. 2007 Oct;30(4):239-43. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(08)60032-9.
9
Non-anesthesiologist administration of propofol sedation for colonoscopy is safe in low risk patients: results of a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.非麻醉医师管理丙泊酚镇静用于结肠镜检查在低危患者中是安全的:一项非劣效性随机对照试验的结果。
Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):747-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-105560. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
10
Prospective long-term assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient satisfaction for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy.上消化道内镜检查和结肠镜检查镇静相关不良事件及患者满意度的前瞻性长期评估。
Digestion. 2014;90(1):42-8. doi: 10.1159/000363567. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations.常规胃肠内镜检查的镇静实践:推荐意见的系统评价
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-01561-z.
2
Evaluation of an Objective Measurement Tool for Stress Level Reduction by Individually Chosen Music During Colonoscopy-Results From the Study "ColoRelaxTone".“结肠放松音调”研究:结肠镜检查期间通过个人选择的音乐降低压力水平的客观测量工具评估结果
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 15;7:525. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00525. eCollection 2020.
3
[Multimodal recognition of pain intensity and pain modality with machine learning].
[基于机器学习的疼痛强度和疼痛模态的多模态识别]
Schmerz. 2020 Oct;34(5):400-409. doi: 10.1007/s00482-020-00468-8.
4
Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020.2020 年结直肠癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 May;70(3):145-164. doi: 10.3322/caac.21601. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
5
Colorectal Cancer Screening.结直肠癌筛查
JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):2022-2023. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.4842.
6
Multi-Modal Signals for Analyzing Pain Responses to Thermal and Electrical Stimuli.用于分析对热刺激和电刺激的疼痛反应的多模态信号。
J Vis Exp. 2019 Apr 5(146). doi: 10.3791/59057.
7
Propofol sedation in colonoscopy: from satisfied patients to improved quality indicators.结肠镜检查中的丙泊酚镇静:从患者满意到质量指标改善
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 26;12:105-110. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S186393. eCollection 2019.
8
[Current evidence and development of colorectal cancer screening in Germany].[德国结直肠癌筛查的当前证据与进展]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Dec;61(12):1513-1516. doi: 10.1007/s00103-018-2832-x.
9
Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction.常规胃肠道内镜检查的镇静:疗效、安全性、效率、成本及满意度综述
Intest Res. 2017 Oct;15(4):456-466. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.456. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
10
Modifiable factors associated with patient-reported pain during and after screening colonoscopy.可改变因素与筛查结肠镜检查期间和检查后患者报告的疼痛相关。
Gut. 2018 Nov;67(11):1958-1964. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313905. Epub 2017 Sep 28.