• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用条件价值评估方法改善固体废物管理设施:来自马来西亚吉隆坡的证据。

Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility: evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management Science, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2011 Apr;31(4):800-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.028. Epub 2010 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.028
PMID:21169007
Abstract

This study employed contingent valuation method to estimate the willingness to pay (WTP) of the households to improve the waste collection system in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The objective of this study is to evaluate how household WTP changes when recycling and waste separation at source is made mandatory. The methodology consisted of asking people directly about their WTP for an additional waste collection service charge to cover the costs of a new waste management project. The new waste management project consisted of two versions: version A (recycling and waste separation is mandatory) and version B (recycling and waste separation is not mandatory). The households declined their WTP for version A when they were asked to separate the waste at source although all the facilities would be given to them for waste separation. The result of this study indicates that the households were not conscious about the benefits of recycling and waste separation. Concerted efforts should be taken to raise environmental consciousness of the households through education and more publicity regarding waste separation, reducing and recycling.

摘要

本研究采用意愿调查评估法来估算吉隆坡家庭愿意为改善垃圾收集系统支付的意愿(WTP)。本研究的目的是评估当源头的回收和废物分类成为强制性要求时,家庭 WTP 会如何变化。该方法包括直接询问人们对额外的垃圾收集服务收费的支付意愿,以支付新的废物管理项目的费用。新的废物管理项目有两个版本:版本 A(强制回收和废物分类)和版本 B(不强制回收和废物分类)。当被要求对垃圾进行源头分类时,家庭对版本 A 的支付意愿下降了,尽管所有的设施都会提供给他们进行废物分类。这项研究的结果表明,家庭对回收和废物分类的好处没有意识。应该通过教育和更多关于废物分类、减少和回收的宣传,来共同努力提高家庭的环境意识。

相似文献

1
Using a contingent valuation approach for improved solid waste management facility: evidence from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.运用条件价值评估方法改善固体废物管理设施:来自马来西亚吉隆坡的证据。
Waste Manag. 2011 Apr;31(4):800-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.028. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
2
Willingness to pay for waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh.孟加拉国达卡市为改善废物管理的支付意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Jan;90(1):492-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.12.012. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
3
Factors and values of willingness to pay for improved construction waste management--a perspective of Malaysian contractors.改善建筑垃圾管理的支付意愿因素及价值——马来西亚承包商视角
Waste Manag. 2007;27(12):1902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Nov 15.
4
Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience.居民厨余垃圾分类行为与便利性的重要性。
Waste Manag. 2014 Jul;34(7):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
5
Household demand for waste recycling services.家庭对废物回收服务的需求。
Environ Manage. 2005 Feb;35(2):121-9. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0044-7.
6
Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste.定量评估收集点的距离和改进源头分类的信息以提高家庭废物的分类。
Waste Manag. 2015 Jun;40:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
7
Life cycle assessment of a household solid waste source separation programme: a Swedish case study.家庭固体废物源头分类计划的生命周期评估:瑞典案例研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2011 Oct;29(10):1027-42. doi: 10.1177/0734242X11406170. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
8
Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees.为电子垃圾回收融资:加利福尼亚家庭支付先进回收费用的意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2007 Sep;84(4):547-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.07.003. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
9
Comparison of different collection systems for sorted household waste in Spain.西班牙不同分类家庭垃圾收集系统的比较。
Waste Manag. 2010 Dec;30(12):2430-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.05.026. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
10
Environmental management of construction and demolition waste in Kuwait.科威特建筑与拆除废物的环境管理
Waste Manag. 2004;24(10):1049-59. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.06.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental benefits of blue ecosystem services and residents' willingness to pay in Khulna city, Bangladesh.孟加拉国库尔纳市蓝色生态系统服务的环境效益及居民支付意愿
Heliyon. 2022 May 24;8(5):e09535. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09535. eCollection 2022 May.
2
Determinants of Unsafe Plastic Waste Disposal among Households in the Tamale Metropolitan Area, Ghana.加纳塔马利都会区家庭不安全塑料废物处置的决定因素
J Environ Public Health. 2021 Oct 7;2021:9974029. doi: 10.1155/2021/9974029. eCollection 2021.
3
Factors that affect the willingness of residents to pay for solid waste management in Hong Kong.
影响香港居民支付固体废物管理意愿的因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(8):7504-7517. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1009-8. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
4
Estimating farmers' willingness to pay for climate change adaptation: the case of the Malaysian agricultural sector.评估农民为适应气候变化的支付意愿:以马来西亚农业部门为例。
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):38. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4254-z. Epub 2015 Jan 30.