• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状效度测试及其潜在的心理生理反应模式:一项初步研究。

Symptom validity testing and its underlying psychophysiological response pattern: a preliminary study.

机构信息

Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológico, Universidad de Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;26(2):133-43. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq099. Epub 2010 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acq099
PMID:21169274
Abstract

Very little is known about the autonomic psychophysiological responses while individuals are executing a Symptom Validity Test. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the peripheral psychophysiological correlates (electrodermal conductance and heart rate) during the performance of the Victoria Symptom Validity Test (VSVT). The sample of this study was composed of 30 participants who underwent the VSVT under two conditions: Exaggeration of cognitive deficits (ECD) and normal effort. Our results showed differences on skin conductance between correct answers and errors limited to the decision-making phase of the ECD condition. Those differences found in the maximum conductance value when participants decide to simulate their deficits could be related to emotional activation. No differences were found on the variable heart rate between the two conditions of the study. Implications of these results are discussed.

摘要

关于个体在执行症状效度测试时的自主心理生理反应,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是分析在执行维多利亚症状效度测试(VSVT)时的外周心理生理相关性(皮肤电导率和心率)。本研究的样本由 30 名参与者组成,他们在两种条件下接受了 VSVT:认知缺陷夸大(ECD)和正常努力。我们的研究结果表明,在 ECD 条件的决策阶段,正确答案和错误答案之间的皮肤电导率存在差异。当参与者决定模拟自己的缺陷时,在最大电导率值上发现的这些差异可能与情绪激活有关。在研究的两种情况下,心率变量没有差异。讨论了这些结果的含义。

相似文献

1
Symptom validity testing and its underlying psychophysiological response pattern: a preliminary study.症状效度测试及其潜在的心理生理反应模式:一项初步研究。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Mar;26(2):133-43. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acq099. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
2
Development of decision making in school-aged children and adolescents: evidence from heart rate and skin conductance analysis.学龄儿童和青少年决策能力的发展:来自心率和皮肤电传导分析的证据。
Child Dev. 2007 Jul-Aug;78(4):1288-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01066.x.
3
The latent structure of cognitive symptom exaggeration on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test.维多利亚症状效度测试中认知症状夸大的潜在结构。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22(2):197-211. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
4
Anxiety impairs decision-making: psychophysiological evidence from an Iowa Gambling Task.焦虑会损害决策能力:来自爱荷华赌博任务的心理生理学证据。
Biol Psychol. 2008 Mar;77(3):353-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.010. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
5
Cognitive performance and autonomic reactivity in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers.戒毒者与非吸毒者的认知表现和自主反应性
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Feb;13(1):25-40. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.13.1.25.
6
Framing the ultimatum game: gender differences and autonomic responses.构建最后通牒博弈:性别差异与自主反应。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(3):263-71. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.656127. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
7
Victoria Symptom Validity Test performance in acute severe traumatic brain injury: implications for test interpretation.急性重度创伤性脑损伤中维多利亚症状效度测试的表现:对测试解读的启示
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Aug;21(5):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
8
Predicting autonomic reactivity to public speaking: don't get fixed on self-report data!预测对公开演讲的自主反应:不要局限于自我报告数据!
Int J Psychophysiol. 2004 May;52(3):217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.10.008.
9
Autonomic correlates of social anxiety and embarrassment in shy and non-shy individuals.害羞与非害羞个体社交焦虑和尴尬的自主神经关联。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Nov 8.
10
Psycho-physiological responses to expressive piano performance.表达性钢琴演奏的心理生理反应。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Mar;75(3):268-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.12.008. Epub 2009 Dec 16.