The Premature Infant Follow-up Program, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville 3052, Australia.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2011 Feb-Mar;32(2):117-24. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318206d5c9.
School readiness is best understood as a framework for assessing profiles of strengths and vulnerabilities of the preschool-age child. Very preterm (VPT) children are at high risk of difficulties in school, and understanding their school readiness skills has the potential to aid successful transition into school. The aim of this study was to determine the school readiness skills of a cohort of VPT children, compared with term controls.
VPT children (gestational age <30 wk or birth weights <1250 g) and term controls were enrolled from a tertiary maternity hospital, Melbourne, Australia into a prospective cohort study. At age 5 years, school readiness skills were evaluated using a combination of parent questionnaires and direct assessments. The 5 domains of school readiness assessed were health and physical development, social-emotional skills, approaches to learning, communication skills, and cognitive skills.
VPT children had standard scores ~½ to 1 SD below those of the term controls in all domains of school readiness, and these differences were not greatly affected by adjustment for social risk differences. Overall, 44% of the VPT group had vulnerabilities in more than 1 domain of school readiness, compared with only 16% of the term controls.
VPT children are more likely than term controls to have significant vulnerabilities in multiple domains of school readiness, and these differences are mostly independent of social risk.
学校准备情况最好被理解为一种评估学龄前儿童优势和劣势的框架。极早产儿(VPT)儿童在学校中存在困难的风险较高,了解他们的学校准备技能有可能帮助他们成功过渡到学校。本研究的目的是确定 VPT 儿童与足月对照组相比的学校准备技能。
VPT 儿童(胎龄<30 周或出生体重<1250 克)和足月对照组从澳大利亚墨尔本的一家三级妇产医院入组前瞻性队列研究。在 5 岁时,使用家长问卷和直接评估相结合的方法评估学校准备技能。评估的学校准备技能的 5 个领域是健康和身体发育、社会情感技能、学习方法、沟通技能和认知技能。
VPT 儿童在所有学校准备技能领域的标准分数均比足月对照组低 0.5 到 1 个标准差,并且这些差异在调整社会风险差异后并没有太大影响。总体而言,44%的 VPT 组在 1 个以上的学校准备技能领域存在脆弱性,而足月对照组只有 16%。
VPT 儿童比足月对照组更有可能在多个学校准备技能领域存在显著的脆弱性,这些差异主要与社会风险无关。