Suppr超能文献

中国、俄罗斯和印度的纳米技术发展趋势。

Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India.

作者信息

Liu Xuan, Zhang Pengzhu, Li Xin, Chen Hsinchun, Dang Yan, Larson Catherine, Roco Mihail C, Wang Xianwen

出版信息

J Nanopart Res. 2009 Nov;11(8):1845-1866. doi: 10.1007/s11051-009-9698-7. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

Abstract

China, Russia, and India are playing an increasingly important role in global nanotechnology research and development (R&D). This paper comparatively inspects the paper and patent publications by these three countries in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database (1976-2007). Bibliographic, content map, and citation network analyses are used to evaluate country productivity, dominant research topics, and knowledge diffusion patterns. Significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers are noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was 31.43% in China, 11.88% in Russia, and 33.51% in India. During the same time, the growth patterns were less consistent in patent publications: the corresponding average rates are 31.13, 10.41, and 5.96%. The three countries' paper impact measured by the average number of citations has been lower than the world average. However, from 2000 to 2007, it experienced rapid increases of about 12.8 times in China, 8 times in India, and 1.6 times in Russia. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) were the most productive institutions in paper publication, with 12,334, 6,773, and 1,831 papers, respectively. The three countries emphasized some common research topics such as "Quantum dots," "Carbon nanotubes," "Atomic force microscopy," and "Scanning electron microscopy," while Russia and India reported more research on nano-devices as compared with China. CAS, RAS, and IIT played key roles in the respective domestic knowledge diffusion.

摘要

中国、俄罗斯和印度在全球纳米技术研发中发挥着越来越重要的作用。本文通过汤姆森科学引文索引扩展版(SCI)数据库和美国专利商标局(USPTO)数据库(1976 - 2007年),对这三个国家的论文和专利出版物进行了比较考察。运用文献计量、内容图谱和引文网络分析来评估各国的生产力、主要研究主题和知识传播模式。研究发现这三个国家纳米技术论文均有显著且持续的增长。2000年至2007年间,中国的年均增长率为31.43%,俄罗斯为11.88%,印度为33.51%。同一时期,专利出版物的增长模式不太一致:相应的平均增长率分别为31.13%、10.41%和5.96%。以平均被引次数衡量,这三个国家的论文影响力低于世界平均水平。然而,2000年至2007年间,中国的该指标迅速增长了约12.8倍,印度增长了8倍,俄罗斯增长了1.6倍。中国科学院(CAS)、俄罗斯科学院(RAS)和印度理工学院(IIT)是论文发表量最高的机构,分别发表了12334篇、6773篇和1831篇论文。这三个国家都强调了一些共同的研究主题,如“量子点”、“碳纳米管”、“原子力显微镜”和“扫描电子显微镜”,不过与中国相比,俄罗斯和印度在纳米器件方面的研究报道更多。中国科学院、俄罗斯科学院和印度理工学院在各自国内的知识传播中发挥了关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5976/2988213/bc55c18df344/11051_2009_9698_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验