Suppr超能文献

60 岁以下原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者:能否延迟全脑放疗?

Primary CNS lymphoma in patients younger than 60: can whole-brain radiotherapy be deferred?

机构信息

AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere, Service de Neurologie Mazarin, et Universite Pierre & Marie Curie Paris VI, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2011 Aug;104(1):323-30. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0497-x. Epub 2010 Dec 19.

Abstract

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been increasingly omitted as the first treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) because of neurotoxicity risks. However, neurotoxicity risks are lower in young (<60 years) patients; deferring WBRT may not be necessary and may compromise disease control. To investigate this question, we report a consecutive series of young (<60 years) PCNSL patients uniformly treated with a response-adjusted approach, with WBRT omitted in patients with chemosensitive disease. Treatment started with induction chemotherapy consisting of methotrexate (3 g/m(2)), CCNU, procarbazine, methylprednisolone and intrathecal methotrexate, cytarabine, and methylprednisolone. Patients achieving complete response (CR) received five additional chemotherapy cycles and no further treatment. Patients with less than CR were treated on an individual basis, typically with WBRT or high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with stem cell rescue. Sixty-four patients were included (median age: 47; median KPS: 70). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months; median overall survival (OS) was 63 months (median follow-up: 108 months). Objective response after induction was 87% (CR: 54%; PR: 33%). To date, salvage WBRT has been given to a total of 27 patients and HDC to 29. Neurotoxicity developed in five patients (none in patients treated with chemotherapy only). Deferring WBRT in chemosensitive patients seems to compromise PFS but not OS. Neurotoxicity was reduced but not eliminated, as salvage WBRT was frequently required. HDC and WBRT were effective salvage treatments. As the objective of treatment in this population is a cure, withholding WBRT may not be the best strategy and deserves further investigation. Ongoing studies are investigating whether upfront treatment with HDC can replace WBRT in this setting.

摘要

全脑放疗(WBRT)由于神经毒性风险而越来越多地被排除在原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)的一线治疗之外。然而,年轻(<60 岁)患者的神经毒性风险较低;推迟 WBRT 可能没有必要,并且可能会影响疾病控制。为了研究这个问题,我们报告了一系列连续的年轻(<60 岁)PCNSL 患者,他们都采用了基于反应的调整方法进行治疗,对化疗敏感的患者不进行 WBRT。治疗开始时采用诱导化疗,包括甲氨蝶呤(3g/m²)、洛莫司汀、丙卡巴肼、甲基强的松龙和鞘内注射甲氨蝶呤、阿糖胞苷和甲基强的松龙。达到完全缓解(CR)的患者接受了五个额外的化疗周期和进一步的治疗。未达到 CR 的患者根据个体情况进行治疗,通常是 WBRT 或高剂量化疗(HDC)加干细胞解救。共纳入 64 例患者(中位年龄:47 岁;中位 KPS:70)。中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 12 个月;中位总生存期(OS)为 63 个月(中位随访时间:108 个月)。诱导后的客观缓解率为 87%(CR:54%;PR:33%)。迄今为止,共有 27 例患者接受了挽救性 WBRT,29 例患者接受了 HDC。5 例患者出现神经毒性(仅接受化疗的患者中无)。在化疗敏感的患者中推迟 WBRT 似乎会影响 PFS,但不影响 OS。神经毒性虽然降低了,但并未消除,因为经常需要挽救性 WBRT。HDC 和 WBRT 是有效的挽救治疗方法。由于该人群的治疗目标是治愈,因此不进行 WBRT 可能不是最佳策略,值得进一步研究。正在进行的研究正在探讨在这种情况下, upfront 治疗是否可以用 HDC 代替 WBRT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验