Pavia D
Department of Clinical Research, Boehringer Ingelheim (UK) Ltd., Bracknell, Berkshire.
Lung. 1990;168 Suppl:614-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02718185.
Review of the data shows that chest physiotherapy (CP) is effective in clearing secretions from the lungs of patients with copious secretions (i.e., daily sputum production in excess of 30 ml). Assessment of the various components of CP shows that percussion, vibratory shaking, and breathing exercises have little to offer. Although instructed cough, the back up mucus clearance mechanism, is effective in clearing secretions its effect is less than that achieved with the forced expiration technique (FET). Postural drainage (PD) is on the whole successful in helping to drain secretions in the lungs. The administration of a beta 2-agonist via a nebulizer prior to CP in addition to promoting bronchodilation may also help to alter the physical properties of secretions, rendering them more amenable for clearance by FET/cough. Technology regarding high-frequency oscillations (HFO) has yet to be improved and its efficacy in clearing excess secretions proven prior to its inclusion in a CP treatment regimen. Intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) may have a role to play in those patients where conventional CP is not possible. Data with positive expiratory pressure (PEP) are encouraging and direct evaluation is awaited regarding its effect on mucus clearance. With our present knowledge it seems reasonable to recommend that physiotherapists concentrate their CP treatment on the following: administration of a nebulized beta 2-agonist followed by PD and FET.
数据回顾显示,胸部物理治疗(CP)对于清除大量分泌物患者(即每日痰液分泌量超过30毫升)肺部的分泌物是有效的。对CP各个组成部分的评估表明,叩击、振动摇晃和呼吸练习作用不大。尽管指导性咳嗽作为备用的黏液清除机制在清除分泌物方面是有效的,但其效果不如用力呼气技术(FET)。体位引流(PD)总体上成功地帮助排出了肺部的分泌物。在CP之前通过雾化器给予β2激动剂,除了促进支气管扩张外,还可能有助于改变分泌物的物理性质,使其更易于通过FET/咳嗽清除。关于高频振荡(HFO)的技术还有待改进,在将其纳入CP治疗方案之前,其清除过多分泌物的疗效尚需证实。间歇正压通气(IPPB)可能在无法进行传统CP的患者中发挥作用。呼气末正压(PEP)的数据令人鼓舞,期待对其对黏液清除的影响进行直接评估。根据我们目前的认识,建议物理治疗师将CP治疗集中在以下方面似乎是合理的:雾化吸入β2激动剂,然后进行PD和FET。