Dept of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2011 Jan;135(1):132-8. doi: 10.1309/AJCPLNO4PFVZVA4P.
Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis has emerged as the method of choice for testing to resolve specimen source contamination and identity problems that arise in surgical pathology. We studied a series of consecutive cases referred for STR typing during a 5-year period to document the usefulness of the approach and to describe the broadening scope of testing. The series demonstrates that STR-based typing can be applied in virtually any setting in which specimen source confirmation is requested, that STR-based typing is informative in 92% of cases, but that exceptions occasionally arise that complicate test interpretation. The series also demonstrates that in addition to traditional uses of STR typing, testing is now performed in the absence of any direct indication that a specimen mix-up or contamination may have occurred, namely, when the pathologic findings are unexpected or the clinical setting is atypical. The case series underscores the ability of STR testing to detect errors that cannot be captured by current laboratory protocols, a finding that has important implications for patient safety.
短串联重复序列(STR)分析已成为检测的首选方法,可用于解决外科病理学中出现的样本来源污染和身份识别问题。我们研究了一系列连续病例,这些病例在 5 年内被转介进行 STR 分型,以记录该方法的有用性并描述检测范围的扩大。该系列表明,基于 STR 的分型几乎可以应用于任何需要确认样本来源的情况下,92%的情况下基于 STR 的分型具有信息性,但偶尔会出现一些例外情况,使测试解释变得复杂。该系列还表明,除了 STR 分型的传统用途外,现在即使没有直接迹象表明样本可能发生了混合或污染,也会进行测试,即当病理发现出乎意料或临床情况不典型时。该病例系列强调了 STR 测试检测无法通过当前实验室方案捕获的错误的能力,这一发现对患者安全具有重要意义。