Isaacs Mike, Lennerz Jochen K, Yates Stacey, Clermont Walter, Rossi Joan, Pfeifer John D
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Pathol Inform. 2011;2:39. doi: 10.4103/2153-3539.84232. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
Whole slide imaging (WSI) makes it possible to capture images of an entire histological slide. WSI has established roles in surgical pathology, including support of off-site frozen section interpretation, primary diagnosis, educational activities, and laboratory quality assurance (QA) activities. Analyses of the cost of WSI have traditionally been based solely on direct costs and diagnostic accuracy; however, these types of analyses largely ignore workflow and cost issues that arise as a result of redundancy, the need for additional staffing, and customized software development when WSI is integrated into routine diagnostic surgical pathology. The pre-scan, scan, and post-scan costs; quality control and QA costs; and IT process costs can be significant, and consequently, pathology groups can find it difficult to perform a realistic cost-benefit analysis of adding WSI to their practice.
In this paper, we report a "value added" approach developed to guide our decisions regarding integration of WSI into surgical pathology practice. The approach focuses on specific operational measures (cost, time, and enhanced patient care) and practice settings (clinical, education, and research) to identify routine activities in which the addition of WSI can provide improvements.
When applied to our academic pathology group practice, the value added approach resulted in expanded and improved operations, as demonstrated by outcome based measures.
A value added can be used to perform a realistic cost-benefit analysis of integrating WSI into routine surgical pathology practice.
全玻片成像(WSI)能够捕获整个组织学切片的图像。WSI在外科病理学中已确立了其作用,包括支持远程冰冻切片解读、初步诊断、教育活动以及实验室质量保证(QA)活动。传统上,对WSI成本的分析仅基于直接成本和诊断准确性;然而,这类分析在很大程度上忽略了将WSI整合到常规诊断外科病理学中时因冗余、额外人员配备需求以及定制软件开发而产生的工作流程和成本问题。预扫描、扫描和后扫描成本;质量控制和QA成本;以及IT流程成本可能相当可观,因此,病理学团队可能会发现很难对将WSI添加到其实践中进行现实的成本效益分析。
在本文中,我们报告了一种“增值”方法,该方法用于指导我们关于将WSI整合到外科病理学实践中的决策。该方法侧重于特定的运营指标(成本、时间和改善的患者护理)和实践环境(临床、教育和研究),以确定添加WSI可带来改进的常规活动。
当应用于我们的学术病理学团队实践时,增值方法带来了运营的扩展和改善,基于结果的指标证明了这一点。
增值方法可用于对将WSI整合到常规外科病理学实践中进行现实的成本效益分析。