Mahendra Prashanth K V, Venugopalachar Sridhar
Department of Electronics Engineering, Vivekananda Institute of Technology, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Gudimavu, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore-560074, India.
Noise Health. 2011 Jan-Feb;13(50):16-25. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.73996.
Noise is a common occupational health hazard in most industrial settings. An assessment of noise and its adverse health effects based on noise intensity is inadequate. For an efficient evaluation of noise effects, frequency spectrum analysis should also be included. This paper aims to substantiate the importance of studying the contribution of noise frequencies in evaluating health effects and their association with physiological behavior within human body. Additionally, a review of studies published between 1988 and 2009 that investigate the impact of industrial/occupational noise on auditory and non-auditory effects and the probable association and contribution of noise frequency components to these effects is presented. The relevant studies in English were identified in Medknow, Medline, Wiley, Elsevier, and Springer publications. Data were extracted from the studies that fulfilled the following criteria: title and/or abstract of the given study that involved industrial/occupational noise exposure in relation to auditory and non-auditory effects or health effects. Significant data on the study characteristics, including noise frequency characteristics, for assessment were considered in the study. It is demonstrated that only a few studies have considered the frequency contributions in their investigations to study auditory effects and not non-auditory effects. The data suggest that significant adverse health effects due to industrial noise include auditory and heart-related problems. The study provides a strong evidence for the claims that noise with a major frequency characteristic of around 4 kHz has auditory effects and being deficient in data fails to show any influence of noise frequency components on non-auditory effects. Furthermore, specific noise levels and frequencies predicting the corresponding health impacts have not yet been validated. There is a need for advance research to clarify the importance of the dominant noise frequency contribution in evaluating health effects.
在大多数工业环境中,噪声是一种常见的职业健康危害。基于噪声强度对噪声及其不良健康影响进行评估是不够的。为了有效地评估噪声影响,还应包括频谱分析。本文旨在证实研究噪声频率在评估健康影响及其与人体生理行为的关联方面的重要性。此外,还对1988年至2009年间发表的研究进行了综述,这些研究调查了工业/职业噪声对听觉和非听觉影响,以及噪声频率成分对这些影响的可能关联和贡献。在Medknow、Medline、Wiley、Elsevier和Springer出版物中检索了相关英文研究。从符合以下标准的研究中提取数据:给定研究的标题和/或摘要涉及与听觉和非听觉影响或健康影响相关的工业/职业噪声暴露。研究中考虑了关于研究特征的重要数据,包括用于评估的噪声频率特征。结果表明,只有少数研究在其调查中考虑了频率贡献以研究听觉影响,而非听觉影响方面则没有。数据表明,工业噪声导致的重大不良健康影响包括听觉和心脏相关问题。该研究为以下观点提供了有力证据:主要频率特征约为4 kHz的噪声具有听觉影响,而缺乏数据表明噪声频率成分对非听觉影响没有任何影响。此外,预测相应健康影响的特定噪声水平和频率尚未得到验证。需要进行进一步研究以阐明主导噪声频率贡献在评估健康影响中的重要性。