• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在大隐静脉桥病变中的应用比较。来自 7090 例患者的荟萃分析结果。

Drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft disease. Insights from a meta-analysis of 7,090 patients.

机构信息

Cardiologia 2, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Circ J. 2011;75(2):280-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0186. Epub 2010 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1253/circj.cj-10-0186
PMID:21173499
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence supporting the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) in saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease is uncertain. Previous studies have suggested that DES might reduce the re-intervention rate in SVG disease, with conflicting data on mortality. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes of DES vs. bare metal stent (BMS) in SVG disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Medline and Web databases were searched for studies comparing DES and BMS for SVG disease, reporting rates of overall mortality, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and myocardial infarction (MI) with a follow-up of ≥6 months. The meta-analysis included 23 studies (7,090 patients). Compared with BMS, DES-treated patients had lower rates of TVR (odds ratio (OR), 0.53; confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.72; P<0.0001) and overall mortality (OR, 0.63; CI, 0.40-0.99; P=0.05), but similar rates of MI (OR, 0.92; CI, 0.64-1.33; P=0.7). Subgroup analysis highlighted differences between non-randomized studies, in which DES improved mortality rates, and randomized trials, in which benefit from DES was not evident. Meta-regression analysis showed that DES were more effective in the presence of older grafts and type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis showed that, in SVG disease, DES significantly reduced TVR, but did not provide clear benefits on mortality and MI, with an opposite direction of results in mortality observed from randomized and observational data.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架(DES)在静脉桥血管(SVG)疾病中的应用证据尚不确定。先前的研究表明,DES 可能降低 SVG 疾病中的再介入率,但死亡率的数据存在冲突。因此,进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较 DES 与金属裸支架(BMS)在 SVG 疾病中的疗效。

方法和结果

检索 Medline 和 Web 数据库,以比较 DES 和 BMS 治疗 SVG 疾病的研究,报告总死亡率、靶血管血运重建(TVR)和心肌梗死(MI)的发生率,随访时间≥6 个月。荟萃分析纳入了 23 项研究(7090 例患者)。与 BMS 相比,DES 治疗组的 TVR 发生率较低(比值比(OR),0.53;95%置信区间(CI),0.39-0.72;P<0.0001)和总死亡率(OR,0.63;95%CI,0.40-0.99;P=0.05),但 MI 发生率相似(OR,0.92;95%CI,0.64-1.33;P=0.7)。亚组分析突出了非随机研究和随机试验之间的差异,前者表明 DES 改善了死亡率,后者则表明 DES 没有明显获益。Meta 回归分析显示,DES 在陈旧的移植物和 2 型糖尿病患者中更有效。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,在 SVG 疾病中,DES 显著降低了 TVR,但在死亡率和 MI 方面没有明显获益,随机和观察性数据显示死亡率的结果方向相反。

相似文献

1
Drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents in saphenous vein graft disease. Insights from a meta-analysis of 7,090 patients.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架在大隐静脉桥病变中的应用比较。来自 7090 例患者的荟萃分析结果。
Circ J. 2011;75(2):280-9. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0186. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
2
The final answer? For the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease, drug-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents.最终答案是什么?关于隐静脉移植血管病变的治疗,药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较。
Circ J. 2011;75(2):261-2. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-1262. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
3
Drug eluting versus bare metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein graft lesions: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架用于隐静脉桥病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;19(7 Pt B):837-844. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.大隐静脉移植血管介入治疗中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较:随机试验的最新综合荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft intervention results from the STENT (strategic transcatheter evaluation of new therapies) group.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在静脉桥血管介入治疗中的结果来自 STENT(新疗法的策略性经导管评估)研究组。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.08.020.
6
Treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions with drug-eluting stents: immediate and midterm outcome.药物洗脱支架治疗隐静脉移植血管病变:即刻和中期结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Apr 5;45(7):989-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.060.
7
Seven-year safety and efficacy of the unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents in saphenous vein bypass grafts.药物洗脱支架在静脉桥血管中无限制使用的 7 年安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 May 1;79(6):912-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23145. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
8
The short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stent vs bare-metal stent in saphenous vein graft disease: An updated meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架经皮介入治疗隐静脉移植血管病变的短期和长期疗效:所有随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2018 May;41(5):685-692. doi: 10.1002/clc.22908. Epub 2018 May 11.
9
Comparison of the slow-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting Taxus-Express stent with the bare-metal Express stent for saphenous vein graft interventions.基于缓释聚合物的紫杉醇洗脱TAXUS Express支架与裸金属Express支架用于隐静脉移植血管介入治疗的比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Feb;96(2):70-6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0460-1. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
10
Four-year safety and efficacy of the unrestricted use of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery bypass grafts.雷帕霉素洗脱支架和紫杉醇洗脱支架在冠状动脉旁路移植术中不受限制使用的四年安全性和有效性
EuroIntervention. 2008 Nov;4(3):311-7. doi: 10.4244/eijv4i3a57.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of risk factors, treatment, and prevention of saphenous vein graft disease after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后大隐静脉移植物病变的危险因素、治疗及预防综述
J Int Med Res. 2018 Dec;46(12):4907-4919. doi: 10.1177/0300060518792445. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
2
Early and midterm major adverse cardiac events in patient with saphenous vein graft using direct stenting or embolic protection device stenting.使用直接支架置入术或栓子保护装置支架置入术的大隐静脉移植患者的早期和中期主要不良心脏事件
Res Cardiovasc Med. 2014 Feb;3(1):e13012. doi: 10.5812/cardiovascmed.13012. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
3
Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus-eluting stents versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of 76 studies.
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中雷帕霉素洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的头对头比较:76项研究的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 May 20;9(5):e97934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097934. eCollection 2014.
4
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous interventions in saphenous vein grafts using drug-eluting stents compared to bare-metal stents: a comprehensive meta-analysisof all randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架经皮介入治疗静脉桥的临床结局:所有随机临床试验的综合荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2012 May;35(5):291-6. doi: 10.1002/clc.21984. Epub 2012 Apr 6.