Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ind Health. 2011;49(2):185-94. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1034. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
This study examined the influences of aluminized (Type A) and non-aluminized firefighters' protective clothing (Type B, C, D and CON) on physiological and subjective responses in radiant heat. Total clothing weight was 6.24, 6.38, 6.06, 5.76 and 3.82 kg for Type A, B, C, D and CON, respectively. Eight firefighters performed exercise at an air temperature of 30°C with 50%RH. Three bouts of 10 min-bicycle exercise in radiant heat (a globe temperature of 70°C) was spaced by a 10 min rest with no radiant heat. Results showed that rectal temperature, mean skin temperature, heart rate, and body weight loss were significantly greater in Type A than in other types (p<0.05). For Type A, thermal gradient of the body reached 0.0 ± 0.7°C, heart rate showed a maximum level of 183 ± 11 bpm and 1.9% of body weight was lost due to sweat secretion. Firefighters felt the hottest and most discomfort in Type A. It appeared that firefighters' thermoregulatory mechanism was severely challenged by wearing aluminized protective clothing during exercise in strong radiant heat. Therefore, it is suggested that the safe upper limits while wearing aluminized firefighters' clothing should be distinguished from those for typical firefighters' protective clothing.
本研究考察了镀铝(A 型)和非镀铝(B、C、D 和 CON 型)消防服对热辐射中生理和主观反应的影响。A、B、C、D 和 CON 型防护服的总重量分别为 6.24、6.38、6.06、5.76 和 3.82 公斤。8 名消防员在空气温度为 30°C、相对湿度为 50%的环境下进行运动。在热辐射(球温度为 70°C)中进行三次 10 分钟的自行车运动,每次间隔 10 分钟不接受热辐射的休息。结果表明,A 型消防员的直肠温度、平均皮肤温度、心率和体重下降明显大于其他类型(p<0.05)。对于 A 型,身体的热梯度达到 0.0 ± 0.7°C,心率达到 183 ± 11 bpm 的最高水平,由于出汗,体重损失了 1.9%。消防员在 A 型中感觉最热和最不舒服。看来,消防员的体温调节机制在强烈的热辐射下穿着镀铝防护服进行运动时受到了严重挑战。因此,建议在穿着镀铝消防服时应区分安全上限与典型消防服的安全上限。