Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 318 Campus Drive West, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
J Phys Chem B. 2011 Jan 20;115(2):319-28. doi: 10.1021/jp102587q. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
Water plays a unique role in all living organisms. Not only is it nature's ubiquitous solvent, but it also actively takes part in many cellular processes. In particular, the structure and properties of interfacial water near biomolecules such as proteins are often related to the function of the respective molecule. It can therefore be highly instructive to study the local water density around solutes in cellular systems, particularly when solvent-mediated forces such as the hydrophobic effect are relevant. Computational methods such as molecular dynamics (MD) simulations seem well suited to study these systems at the atomic level. However, due to sampling requirements, it is not clear that MD simulations are, indeed, the method of choice to obtain converged densities at a given level of precision. We here compare the calculation of local water densities with two different methods: MD simulations and the three-dimensional reference interaction site model with the Kovalenko-Hirata closure (3D-RISM-KH). In particular, we investigate the convergence of the local water density to assess the required simulation times for different levels of resolution. Moreover, we provide a quantitative comparison of the densities calculated with MD and with 3D-RISM-KH and investigate the effect of the choice of the water model for both methods. Our results show that 3D-RISM-KH yields density distributions that are very similar to those from MD up to a 0.5 Å resolution, but for significantly reduced computational cost. The combined use of MD and 3D-RISM-KH emerges as an auspicious perspective for efficient solvent sampling in dynamical systems.
水在所有生物中都起着独特的作用。它不仅是自然界无处不在的溶剂,而且还积极参与许多细胞过程。特别是,蛋白质等生物分子附近界面水的结构和性质通常与分子的功能有关。因此,研究细胞系统中溶质周围的局部水密度,特别是在涉及溶剂介导的力(如疏水效应)时,是非常有指导意义的。分子动力学(MD)模拟等计算方法似乎非常适合在原子水平上研究这些系统。然而,由于采样要求,尚不清楚 MD 模拟是否确实是在给定精度水平上获得收敛密度的首选方法。我们在这里比较了两种不同方法的局部水密度计算:分子动力学模拟和具有 Kovalenko-Hirata 封闭的三维参考相互作用位点模型(3D-RISM-KH)。特别是,我们研究了局部水密度的收敛性,以评估不同分辨率水平所需的模拟时间。此外,我们还对 MD 和 3D-RISM-KH 计算的密度进行了定量比较,并研究了两种方法中选择水分子模型的影响。我们的结果表明,3D-RISM-KH 可以生成与 MD 非常相似的密度分布,直到 0.5 Å 的分辨率,但计算成本显著降低。MD 和 3D-RISM-KH 的联合使用为动态系统中的有效溶剂采样提供了一个有希望的视角。