• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高截流血液透析与标准血液透析治疗多发性骨髓瘤肾损害的成本效果模型比较。

Modelled cost-effectiveness of high cut-off haemodialysis compared to standard haemodialysis in the management of myeloma kidney.

机构信息

Cornerstone Research Group Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Feb;27(2):383-91. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.543125. Epub 2010 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1185/03007995.2010.543125
PMID:21175375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 10-20% of multiple myeloma patients experience dialysis-dependent renal failure. This is principally due to myeloma kidney, a tubulointerstitial injury caused by high circulating concentrations of monoclonal free light chains. Studies have found that between 3% and 37% of patients with myeloma kidney requiring dialysis recover renal function. In-vivo studies indicate that extended haemodialysis using high cut-off dialysers (HCO-HD) can remove significant quantities of free light chains and is associated with a renal recovery rate of 63-74% in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of HCO-HD compared to standard HD in the management of myeloma kidney.

METHODS

The study used a lifetime Excel-based decision tree model that followed all patients from treatment of the initial presentation with myeloma kidney requiring dialysis to death. It was populated with published clinical data, United Kingdom costs and expert opinion, using a National Health Service perspective and 3.5% annual discounting.

RESULTS

HCO-HD was dominant to standard HD, meaning it was both more effective (greater life years and quality adjusted life years) and less costly, due to a greater increase in the proportion of patients recovering renal function. The model projected lifetime costs of £31,345 per patient for patients treated with standard haemodialysis only and £24,845 for the new treatment (discounted). The model predicted an average survival of 19.92 months for patients on standard HD and 33.90 months for the new therapy (discounted).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis found that treatment of myeloma kidney using an extended schedule of HCO-HD may substantially improve renal recovery in multiple myeloma patients compared to standard HD, resulting in greater life expectancy and cost savings due to avoided chronic dialysis. Limitations of the study include those common to rare diseases including small study sizes and limited natural history data.

摘要

背景

约 10-20%的多发性骨髓瘤患者出现依赖透析的肾衰竭。这主要是由于骨髓瘤肾,一种由高循环浓度的单克隆游离轻链引起的肾小管间质性损伤。研究发现,3%-37%的需要透析的骨髓瘤肾患者肾功能恢复。体内研究表明,使用高通量透析器(HCO-HD)进行延长血液透析可以去除大量游离轻链,与这些患者 63-74%的肾脏恢复率相关。

目的

本研究旨在评估与标准血液透析相比,HCO-HD 在骨髓瘤肾治疗中的成本效益。

方法

该研究使用了基于 Excel 的终生决策树模型,该模型从所有初始多发性骨髓瘤肾需要透析治疗的患者开始,一直跟踪到死亡。它使用了已发表的临床数据、英国成本和专家意见,采用了国民保健制度的视角和 3.5%的年度贴现率。

结果

HCO-HD 优于标准 HD,这意味着它不仅更有效(增加更多的患者恢复肾功能),而且成本更低,因为恢复肾功能的患者比例更高。该模型预测,仅接受标准血液透析治疗的患者终生费用为 31345 英镑/人,而新治疗方案(折扣后)为 24845 英镑/人。该模型预测,接受标准血液透析的患者平均生存时间为 19.92 个月,而接受新治疗方案的患者为 33.90 个月(折扣后)。

结论

该分析发现,与标准 HD 相比,使用 HCO-HD 延长治疗方案治疗骨髓瘤肾可能会显著提高多发性骨髓瘤患者的肾功能恢复,从而延长预期寿命并节省因避免慢性透析而产生的成本。该研究的局限性包括常见于罕见疾病的局限性,如研究规模小和有限的自然病史数据。

相似文献

1
Modelled cost-effectiveness of high cut-off haemodialysis compared to standard haemodialysis in the management of myeloma kidney.高截流血液透析与标准血液透析治疗多发性骨髓瘤肾损害的成本效果模型比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Feb;27(2):383-91. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.543125. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
2
Haemodialysis using high cut-off dialysers for treating acute renal failure in multiple myeloma.高通量透析器在多发性骨髓瘤急性肾衰竭中的应用。
Nefrologia. 2012;32(1):35-43. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Nov.11094.
3
Immunoglobulin free light chain levels and recovery from myeloma kidney on treatment with chemotherapy and high cut-off haemodialysis.免疫球蛋白游离轻链水平和化疗及高截留血液透析治疗骨髓瘤肾病的恢复。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Oct;27(10):3823-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr773. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
4
Is high cut-off hemodialysis effective in myeloma kidney?
Semin Dial. 2014 May-Jun;27(3):234-6. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12210. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
5
Extended high cut-off haemodialysis for myeloma cast nephropathy in Auckland, 2008-2012.2008 - 2012年奥克兰地区采用高通量血液透析治疗骨髓瘤管型肾病
Nephrology (Carlton). 2014 Jul;19(7):432-5. doi: 10.1111/nep.12267.
6
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment for end-stage renal disease].[终末期肾病治疗的成本效益分析]
Laeknabladid. 2009 Nov;95(11):747-53.
7
Aggregated serum free light chains may prevent adequate removal by high cut-off haemodialysis.聚合血清游离轻链可能会阻碍高通量血液透析的充分清除。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Apr;26(4):1438. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr019. Epub 2011 Mar 15.
8
Differential progression of renal scarring and determinants of late renal recovery in sustained dialysis dependent acute kidney injury secondary to myeloma kidney.骨髓瘤肾病所致持续性透析依赖型急性肾损伤的肾脏瘢痕的差异进展和晚期肾脏恢复的决定因素。
J Clin Pathol. 2010 Oct;63(10):884-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2010.079236.
9
Treatment by long haemodialysis sessions with high cut-off filters in myeloma cast nephropathy: our experience.高截留率血液透析滤过治疗多发性骨髓瘤相关Cast 肾病:我们的经验。
Nefrologia. 2013;33(4):515-23. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.Feb.11932.
10
Efficient removal of immunoglobulin free light chains by hemodialysis for multiple myeloma: in vitro and in vivo studies.血液透析对多发性骨髓瘤游离免疫球蛋白轻链的高效清除:体外和体内研究
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007 Mar;18(3):886-95. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080821. Epub 2007 Jan 17.