Suppr超能文献

七项皮肤镜检查清单再探。

Seven-point checklist of dermoscopy revisited.

机构信息

Dermatology Unit, 1st Medical Department, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2011 Apr;164(4):785-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10194.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most dermoscopic algorithms to diagnose melanoma were established more than 10 years ago and have been tested primarily on clear-cut melanomas and excised melanocytic naevi.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the diagnostic performance of pattern analysis and seven-point checklist on lesions that reflect the current clinical setting, compared with a revised seven-point checklist with a lower threshold for excision.

METHODS

Eight experienced dermatologists viewed dermoscopic images of 100 excised melanomas, 100 excised naevi and 100 monitored naevi. Each lesion was evaluated by pattern analysis and scored as naevus, melanoma or lesion to be excised. Images were then evaluated using the seven-point criteria, with both standard and revised thresholds for excision.

RESULTS

Pooled data using the pattern analysis algorithm showed that 82% of melanomas and 87·5% of monitored naevi were correctly scored as lesion to be excised and benign naevus, respectively. Using the standard and revised thresholds for the seven-point checklist, excision was recommended for 77·9% and 87·8% of the lesions in the melanoma set, respectively. The standard threshold produced 'no excision' recommendations for 85·6% of the monitored naevi, compared with 74·5% using the revised threshold. Pattern analysis, standard seven-point and revised seven-point algorithms resulted in recommendations of 'excision' for 63·6%, 60·3% and 72·0% of the excised naevi, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic approach to naevi and melanoma should be adapted to the current clinical setting, in which patients may present with early-stage melanomas and multiple atypical naevi. To increase sensitivity, a revised seven-point checklist with a lower threshold for excision should be used.

摘要

背景

大多数用于诊断黑色素瘤的皮肤镜算法都是在 10 多年前建立的,主要针对明确的黑色素瘤和切除的黑色素细胞痣进行了测试。

目的

评估基于模式分析和七点检查清单的诊断性能,这些方法适用于反映当前临床环境的病变,与降低切除阈值的修订七点检查清单相比。

方法

8 名经验丰富的皮肤科医生观察了 100 个切除的黑色素瘤、100 个切除的痣和 100 个监测的痣的皮肤镜图像。每个病变都通过模式分析进行评估,并根据痣、黑色素瘤或需要切除的病变进行评分。然后使用七点标准对图像进行评估,包括标准和修订的切除阈值。

结果

使用模式分析算法的汇总数据显示,82%的黑色素瘤和 87.5%的监测痣分别正确地被评为需要切除的病变和良性痣。使用七点检查表的标准和修订阈值,黑色素瘤组中分别有 77.9%和 87.8%的病变被推荐切除。标准阈值对 85.6%的监测痣建议“不切除”,而修订阈值为 74.5%。模式分析、标准七点和修订七点算法分别建议切除 63.6%、60.3%和 72.0%的切除痣。

结论

对痣和黑色素瘤的诊断方法应适应当前的临床环境,在这种环境中,患者可能会出现早期黑色素瘤和多个非典型痣。为了提高敏感性,应使用降低切除阈值的修订七点检查表。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验