• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扭转公众对核能的反对态度:逐步获得对永久性核废料处理设施的公众认可。

Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility.

机构信息

Department of Political Science, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2011 Apr;31(4):629-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x
PMID:21175714
Abstract

Nuclear facilities have long been seen as the top of the list of locally unwanted land uses (LULUs), with nuclear waste repositories generating the greatest opposition. Focusing on the case of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in southern New Mexico, we test competing hypotheses concerning the sources of opposition and support for siting the facility, including demographics, proximity, political ideology, and partisanship, and the unfolding policy process over time. This study tracks the changes of risk perception and acceptance of WIPP over a decade, using measures taken from 35 statewide surveys of New Mexico citizens spanning an 11-year period from fall 1990 to summer 2001. This time span includes periods before and after WIPP became operational. We find that acceptance of WIPP is greater among those whose residences are closest to the WIPP facility. Surprisingly, and contrary to expectations drawn from the broader literature, acceptance is also greater among those who live closest to the nuclear waste transportation route. We also find that ideology, partisanship, government approval, and broader environmental concerns influence support for WIPP acceptance. Finally, the sequence of procedural steps taken toward formal approval of WIPP by government agencies proved to be important to gaining public acceptance, the most significant being the opening of the WIPP facility itself.

摘要

核设施长期以来一直被视为当地不受欢迎的土地利用(LULU)之首,核废料储存库引起了最大的反对。本文以新墨西哥州南部的废物隔离试验工厂(WIPP)为例,测试了有关反对和支持选址的竞争性假设,包括人口统计学、接近度、政治意识形态和党派,以及随着时间的推移展开的政策进程。本研究通过从 1990 年秋季到 2001 年夏季的 11 年期间对新墨西哥州公民进行的 35 项全州调查中采取的措施,跟踪了 WIPP 风险感知和接受度的变化超过十年。这一时间跨度包括 WIPP 开始运营之前和之后的时期。我们发现,居住在离 WIPP 设施最近的人对 WIPP 的接受程度更高。令人惊讶的是,与更广泛的文献中的预期相反,居住在离核废料运输路线最近的人对 WIPP 的接受程度也更高。我们还发现,意识形态、党派、政府批准和更广泛的环境问题会影响对 WIPP 接受的支持。最后,政府机构朝着正式批准 WIPP 采取的程序步骤序列对于获得公众接受至关重要,最重要的是 WIPP 设施本身的开放。

相似文献

1
Reversing nuclear opposition: evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility.扭转公众对核能的反对态度:逐步获得对永久性核废料处理设施的公众认可。
Risk Anal. 2011 Apr;31(4):629-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
2
Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility.放射性废物处置设施的当地接受度分析。
Risk Anal. 2008 Aug;28(4):1021-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01074.x. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
3
Environmental and health impacts of February 14, 2014 radiation release from the nation's only deep geologic nuclear waste repository.2014年2月14日该国唯一的深部地质核废料处置库辐射释放对环境和健康的影响。
J Environ Radioact. 2015 Aug;146:6-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
4
Source term estimation and the isotopic ratio of radioactive material released from the WIPP repository in New Mexico, USA.美国新墨西哥州废物隔离试验厂(WIPP)储存库释放的放射性物质的源项估算及同位素比率
J Environ Radioact. 2016 Jan;151 Pt 1:193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Creating a baseline radiological standard for the waste isolation pilot plant underground.
Isotopes Environ Health Stud. 2004 Sep;40(3):213-20. doi: 10.1080/10256010410001678053.
6
Performance assessment in support of the 1996 compliance certification application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Risk Anal. 1999 Oct;19(5):959-86; discussion 987-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1007022712054.
7
The magnitude and relevance of the February 2014 radiation release from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant repository in New Mexico, USA.2014 年 2 月美国新墨西哥州废物隔离示范厂储存库发生的辐射泄漏的规模和相关性。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Sep 15;565:1124-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.158. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
An overview of EPA regulation of the safe disposal of transuranic waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.美国环境保护局对废物隔离试验工厂中超铀废物安全处置的监管概述。
Health Phys. 2001 Feb;80(2):110-25. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200102000-00002.
9
Issues in establishing an aerosol radiological baseline for the waste isolation pilot plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico.在新墨西哥州卡尔斯巴德附近的废物隔离试验工厂建立气溶胶放射基线的相关问题。
Health Phys. 1997 Feb;72(2):300-8. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199702000-00015.
10
Ongoing environmental monitoring and assessment of the long-term impacts of the February 2014 radiological release from the waste isolation pilot plant.持续进行环境监测和评估,以了解 2014 年 2 月废物隔离示范工厂放射性物质释放对环境的长期影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(17):17038-17049. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1795-7. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Penalty or premium for foreign ownership in Thailand? Comparing public support for waste-to-energy plants operated by Thai, Japanese, and Chinese Companies.泰国对外资所有权的惩罚或优惠?比较公众对泰国、日本和中国公司运营的垃圾焚烧发电厂的支持度。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0328165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328165. eCollection 2025.
2
Moralization and extremism robustly amplify myside sharing.道德化和极端主义有力地加剧了我方观点分享。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Apr 10;2(4):pgad078. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad078. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Comparing public support for nuclear and wind energy in Washington State.
比较华盛顿州民众对核能和风能的支持度。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284208. eCollection 2023.
4
Pursuing decarbonization along with national security: Assessing public support for the Thacker Pass lithium mine.追求脱碳与国家安全并行:评估公众对 Thacker Pass 锂矿的支持。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280720. eCollection 2023.
5
Jennifer A. Salisbury-Be persistent, consistent, and trustworthy.詹妮弗·A·索尔兹伯里——坚持不懈、始终如一、值得信赖。
Risk Anal. 2022 Nov;42(11):2478-2483. doi: 10.1111/risa.14062.
6
Perceptional differences in the factors of local acceptance of waste incineration plant.垃圾焚烧厂当地接受度因素中的认知差异。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 19;13:1067886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1067886. eCollection 2022.
7
Research on the Paths and Effectiveness of Governance Tools Based on the Evolution of Environmental NIMBY Event.基于环境邻避事件演化的治理工具路径与成效研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 10;19(4):1985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19041985.
8
Two Paradigmatic Waves of Public Discourse on Nuclear Waste in the United States, 1945-2009: Understanding a Magnitudinal and Longitudinal Phenomenon in Anthropological Terms.1945年至2009年美国关于核废料的两种典型公众话语浪潮:从人类学角度理解一种规模性和纵向性现象。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157652. eCollection 2016.