Department of Hämatologie/Onkologie/Hämostaseologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Eur J Haematol. 2011 Apr;86(4):277-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01566.x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
The regulation of biosimilars is a process that is still developing. In Europe, guidance regarding the approval and use of biosimilars has evolved with the products under consideration. It is now more than 3 years since the first biosimilar agents in oncology support, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, were approved in the EU. More recently, biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factors have received marketing approval in Europe. This review considers general issues surrounding the introduction of biosimilars and highlights current specific issues pertinent to their use in clinical practice in oncology. Information on marketing approval, extrapolation, labelling, substitution, immunogenicity and traceability of each biosimilar product is important, especially in oncology where patients are treated in repeated therapy courses, often with complicated protocols, and where biosimilars are not used as a unique therapy for replacement of e.g. growth hormone or insulin. While future developments in the regulation of biosimilars will need to address multiple issues, in the interim physicians should remain aware of the inherent differences between biosimilar and innovator products.
生物类似药的监管是一个不断发展的过程。在欧洲,随着所考虑产品的变化,关于生物类似药的批准和使用的指导意见也在不断发展。自欧盟首次批准肿瘤支持、促红细胞生成素刺激剂等生物类似药以来,已经过去了 3 年多。最近,生物类似粒细胞集落刺激因子在欧洲获得了上市批准。这篇综述考虑了生物类似药引入的一般问题,并强调了目前与肿瘤学临床实践中使用相关的具体问题。关于每个生物类似药产品的营销批准、外推、标签、替代、免疫原性和可追溯性的信息非常重要,特别是在肿瘤学领域,患者经常接受重复的治疗疗程,而且治疗方案往往很复杂,并且生物类似药并不是唯一的治疗药物,例如用于替代生长激素或胰岛素。虽然生物类似药监管的未来发展需要解决多个问题,但在此期间,医生应始终意识到生物类似药和创新产品之间的固有差异。