Suppr超能文献

[右半结肠腹腔镜切除术患者体外与体内吻合的病例对照研究]

[A case-control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy].

作者信息

Chaves Jorge Arredondo, Idoate Carlos Pastor, Fons Jorge Baixauli, Oliver Manuel Bellver, Rodríguez Nicolás Pedano, Delgado Alvaro Bueno, Lizoain José Luis Hernández

机构信息

Departamento de Cirugía General, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, España.

出版信息

Cir Esp. 2011 Jan;89(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.10.003. Epub 2010 Dec 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is still insufficient scientific evidence on which is the best technique to perform the anastomosis -intracorporeal (IC) or extracorporeal (EC)- in right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. The objective of the present study is to determine whether there are differences to compare in both techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A study was performed on a prospective patient series subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy in our Hospital. The preoperative and the postoperative variables associated with complications recorded depending on the type of anastomosis.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were intervened form June 2004 to June 2010 (35 IC; 25 EC). There were no significant differences between both groups as regards baseline preoperative characteristics or associated comorbidities. The median operation time was 212 minutes (142-305 min), with no significant difference between both techniques. The number of lymph nodes removed was higher in the IC group (21 versus 14; p=0.03). The beginning of oral tolerance and the first bowel movement were significantly earlier in the IC group. The complications rate was similar for both groups (14% IC; 16% EC; p=0.89). Three patients in the IC group had anastomosis dehiscence. The mortality rate was 2.8% (one patient in each group).

CONCLUSION

Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right laparoscopic hemicolectomy can obtain a higher number of resected lymph nodes and an earlier oral tolerance and intestinal transit.

摘要

引言

关于在右半结肠腹腔镜切除术中进行吻合的最佳技术——体内(IC)还是体外(EC)——目前仍缺乏足够的科学证据。本研究的目的是确定这两种技术在比较时是否存在差异。

材料与方法

对我院接受右半结肠腹腔镜切除术的前瞻性患者系列进行了一项研究。根据吻合类型记录术前和术后与并发症相关的变量。

结果

2004年6月至2010年6月期间共对60例患者进行了干预(35例IC;25例EC)。两组在术前基线特征或相关合并症方面无显著差异。中位手术时间为212分钟(142 - 305分钟),两种技术之间无显著差异。IC组切除的淋巴结数量更多(21个对14个;p = 0.03)。IC组口服耐受性开始和首次排便明显更早。两组的并发症发生率相似(IC组14%;EC组16%;p = 0.89)。IC组有3例患者发生吻合口裂开。死亡率为2.8%(每组各1例患者)。

结论

在右半结肠腹腔镜切除术中,体内吻合与体外吻合相比,可以获得更多数量的切除淋巴结以及更早的口服耐受性和肠道蠕动。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验