The May Center for Education and Neurorehabilitation, Brockton, MA, USA.
Behav Modif. 2011 Jan;35(1):78-94. doi: 10.1177/0145445510391242.
The purpose of this study was to examine utility of a brief experimental analysis (BEA) in determining effective sight word interventions for a student with a history of difficulty with acquiring sight word recognition. Ten interventions were compared in a BEA. Following the BEA, an extended analysis was conducted that compared the two most effective interventions (from the BEA) with a control condition. Even though the BEA found two interventions to be relatively equal, one of the two interventions resulted in acquisition in half the sessions as the other intervention and this was replicated in a second extended analysis. Implications for BEA and recommendations for future research are discussed.
本研究旨在考察简短实验分析(BEA)在确定具有困难获取视觉词汇识别史的学生的有效视觉词汇干预措施方面的效用。在 BEA 中比较了十种干预措施。在 BEA 之后,进行了扩展分析,将两种最有效的干预措施(来自 BEA)与对照条件进行了比较。尽管 BEA 发现两种干预措施相对相等,但其中一种干预措施的获得速度是另一种干预措施的一半,这在第二次扩展分析中得到了复制。讨论了 BEA 的含义和对未来研究的建议。