Division of Trauma Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Virulence. 2010 Sep-Oct;1(5):367-75. doi: 10.4161/viru.1.5.12796.
Data on Candida infection among critically ill trauma patients are limited and not recently updated. Here we study the epidemiology and economic impact of Candida and examine potential risk factors for Candida infection in this population.
In this 5-year retrospective study, all severely injured patients with ≥4 days of intensive care unit stay were included, with the primary outcome being Candida infection. We identified 3 distinct patient groups: 1) The Candida infection, 2) The Candida colonization and 3) the Candida-free group. All comparisons between groups with p-values ≤0.2 from the univariate analysis were entered into stepwise logistic regression to identify independent risk factors for candidiasis.
374 patients were included. Upon comparisons between groups, candidiasis patients received significantly more blood transfusions (p=0.013), antibiotics (p=0.005), and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (p=0.004), had a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (p=0.008) and underwent more laparotomy procedures than Candida free patients (56.5% versus 16.4%; p<0.001). Surgical complications (13% versus 1.4%; p=0.013), injury of the upper (13% versus 0.9%; p=0.007) and lower gastrointestinal tract (8.7% versus 0.9%; p=0.048), and bacterial wound or intra-abdominal infections (17.4% versus 1.9%; p=0.004) were also more common in candidiasis patients. Upon multivariate analysis, patients receiving TPN had 7-fold higher odds for developing candidiasis (Odds ratio [OR]: 7.2; 95% Confidence interval [CI]: 2.6-19.4; p=0.0001). Other predisposing factors included laparotomy (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.5-9.9; p=0.0057) and female gender (OR: 5.7; 95% CI: 2.1-15.6; p=0.0007). Average total hospital charges were higher for patients with Candida infection compared to patients with Candida colonization or without a positive Candida culture.
TPN, laparotomy, and female gender independently predict the development of candidiasis among trauma patients. Severely injured women requiring laparotomy and TPN therapy should be carefully managed for the possibility of increased risk for candidiasis.
关于危重症创伤患者念珠菌感染的数据有限,且最近没有更新。本研究旨在调查该人群中念珠菌的流行病学和经济影响,并探讨念珠菌感染的潜在危险因素。
这是一项回顾性的 5 年研究,纳入了所有 ICU 住院时间≥4 天的严重创伤患者,主要结局为念珠菌感染。我们将患者分为三组:1)念珠菌感染组,2)念珠菌定植组,3)无念珠菌组。单因素分析中 p 值≤0.2 的所有组间比较均纳入逐步逻辑回归,以确定念珠菌病的独立危险因素。
共纳入 374 例患者。与无念珠菌组相比,念珠菌感染组患者接受的输血(p=0.013)、抗生素(p=0.005)和全胃肠外营养(TPN)(p=0.004)更多,机械通气(MV)时间更长(p=0.008),接受剖腹手术的次数更多(56.5%比 16.4%;p<0.001)。与无念珠菌组相比,手术并发症(13%比 1.4%;p=0.013)、上消化道(13%比 0.9%;p=0.007)和下消化道(8.7%比 0.9%;p=0.048)损伤以及细菌伤口或腹腔内感染(17.4%比 1.9%;p=0.004)更为常见。多因素分析显示,接受 TPN 的患者发生念珠菌病的风险增加 7 倍(优势比 [OR]:7.2;95%置信区间 [CI]:2.6-19.4;p=0.0001)。其他易患因素包括剖腹手术(OR:3.8;95%CI:1.5-9.9;p=0.0057)和女性(OR:5.7;95%CI:2.1-15.6;p=0.0007)。与念珠菌定植或无念珠菌培养阳性的患者相比,念珠菌感染患者的平均总住院费用更高。
TPN、剖腹手术和女性是创伤患者发生念珠菌病的独立预测因素。需要剖腹手术和 TPN 治疗的严重创伤女性应密切管理,以预防念珠菌病风险增加。