• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便潜血患者的评估与治疗:一项决策分析

Evaluation and therapy of the patient with fecal occult blood loss: a decision analysis.

作者信息

Lashner B A, Silverstein M D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Sep;85(9):1088-95.

PMID:2117850
Abstract

We performed a decision analysis to evaluate cost per cancer detected, cost per neoplasm detected, and cost per treatable lesion of two common diagnostic strategies, barium enema-proctoscopy or colonoscopy as the first diagnostic test, for patients with fecal occult blood loss. The prevalence of polyps, cancer, and angiodysplasia, and the colonoscopy success rate were obtained from consecutive colonoscopy records. Costs were estimated from hospital charges; sensitivity and specificity of barium enema and colonoscopy were obtained from the literature. For treatable lesions (cancer, polyps, and angiodysplasia), the colonoscopy first strategy had a higher sensitivity (80% vs. 57%) and a higher specificity (95% vs. 80%) than the barium enema first strategy. Cost effectiveness measures were similar for the two strategies. Colonoscopy as the first diagnostic test had a lower cost per treatable lesion ($2,319 vs. $2,895) and a lower cost per neoplasm detected ($2,694 vs. $2,896), whereas the barium enema first strategy had a lower cost per cancer detected ($10,050 vs. $10,297). The lower cost per treatable lesion of the colonoscopy first strategy was not affected by changes in the prevalence of lesions, test characteristics, costs of tests, or colonoscopy success rate over clinically relevant ranges. The higher cost of colonoscopy was offset by its greater sensitivity and its capacity for biopsy and therapy. Therefore, since the cost per treatable lesion is lower and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value is superior, colonoscopy is recommended as the preferred initial test in evaluating a patient with fecal occult blood loss.

摘要

我们进行了一项决策分析,以评估两种常见诊断策略(以钡剂灌肠 - 直肠镜检查或结肠镜检查作为首次诊断测试)对粪便潜血患者每检测到一例癌症、每检测到一例肿瘤以及每一个可治疗病变的成本。息肉、癌症和血管发育异常的患病率以及结肠镜检查成功率来自连续的结肠镜检查记录。成本根据医院收费估算;钡剂灌肠和结肠镜检查的敏感性和特异性来自文献。对于可治疗病变(癌症、息肉和血管发育异常),先进行结肠镜检查的策略比先进行钡剂灌肠的策略具有更高的敏感性(80%对57%)和更高的特异性(95%对80%)。两种策略的成本效益指标相似。作为首次诊断测试,结肠镜检查每一个可治疗病变的成本更低(2319美元对2895美元),每检测到一例肿瘤的成本更低(2694美元对2896美元),而先进行钡剂灌肠的策略每检测到一例癌症的成本更低(10050美元对10297美元)。先进行结肠镜检查的策略每一个可治疗病变的较低成本不受病变患病率、检测特征、检测成本或结肠镜检查成功率在临床相关范围内变化的影响。结肠镜检查较高的成本被其更高的敏感性以及活检和治疗能力所抵消。因此,由于每一个可治疗病变的成本更低,且敏感性、特异性和预测价值更高,所以建议将结肠镜检查作为评估粪便潜血患者的首选初始检查。

相似文献

1
Evaluation and therapy of the patient with fecal occult blood loss: a decision analysis.粪便潜血患者的评估与治疗:一项决策分析
Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Sep;85(9):1088-95.
2
Screening for colorectal cancer: the cost to find an advanced adenoma.结直肠癌筛查:发现晚期腺瘤的成本。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Nov;97(11):2902-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.07059.x.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening strategies in Singapore: a dynamic decision analytic approach.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):104-10.
4
Limitations of the faecal occult blood test in screening for colorectal cancer.粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查中的局限性。
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Mar;31(2):119-26.
5
The use of screening colonoscopy for patients cared for by the Department of Veterans Affairs.退伍军人事务部为患者提供的筛查结肠镜检查服务。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Nov 13;166(20):2202-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.20.2202.
6
Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.太白山研讨会:结直肠癌筛查的障碍——经济学、能力与依从性
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Dec;23 Suppl 2:S198-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05556.x.
7
Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants.
Clin Radiol. 2001 May;56(5):401-9. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0672.
8
Rectosigmoid polyps as markers of proximal colonic neoplasms: a cost benefit analysis of different diagnostic protocols.直肠乙状结肠息肉作为近端结肠肿瘤的标志物:不同诊断方案的成本效益分析
Anticancer Res. 1995 Mar-Apr;15(2):563-7.
9
Sensitivity of diagnostic examinations for colorectal polyps.结直肠息肉诊断检查的敏感性。
Tech Coloproctol. 2004 Dec;8 Suppl 2:s273-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0175-0.
10
Cost evaluation in a colorectal cancer screening programme by faecal occult blood test in the District of Florence.佛罗伦萨地区通过粪便潜血试验进行的结直肠癌筛查项目中的成本评估。
J Med Screen. 2008;15(4):175-81. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.008032.