• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意跨模态相关的皮质表面小且无系统的拓扑变化。

Minor and unsystematic cortical topographic changes of attention correlates between modalities.

机构信息

Laboratory of Psychophysiology, Faculdade da Saúde, Universidade Metodista de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Dec 17;5(12):e15022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0015022
PMID:21179421
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3003700/
Abstract

In this study we analyzed the topography of induced cortical oscillations in 20 healthy individuals performing simple attention tasks. We were interested in qualitatively replicating our recent findings on the localization of attention-induced beta bands during a visual task [1], and verifying whether significant topographic changes would follow the change of attention to the auditory modality. We computed corrected latency averaging of each induced frequency bands, and modeled their generators by current density reconstruction with Lp-norm minimization. We quantified topographic similarity between conditions by an analysis of correlations, whereas the inter-modality significant differences in attention correlates were illustrated in each individual case. We replicated the qualitative result of highly idiosyncratic topography of attention-related activity to individuals, manifested both in the beta bands, and previously studied slow potential distributions [2]. Visual inspection of both scalp potentials and distribution of cortical currents showed minor changes in attention-related bands with respect to modality, as compared to the theta and delta bands, known to be major contributors to the sensory-related potentials. Quantitative results agreed with visual inspection, supporting to the conclusion that attention-related activity does not change much between modalities, and whatever individual changes do occur, they are not systematic in cortical localization across subjects. We discuss our results, combined with results from other studies that present individual data, with respect to the function of cortical association areas.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们分析了 20 名健康个体在执行简单注意力任务时诱导的皮质振荡的地形。我们有兴趣在定性上复制我们最近在视觉任务中关于注意力诱导β波段定位的发现[1],并验证注意力向听觉模式的变化是否会导致显著的地形变化。我们计算了每个诱导频率带的校正潜伏期平均值,并通过最小化 Lp 范数的电流密度重建来模拟它们的发生器。我们通过相关性分析来量化条件之间的地形相似性,而在每个个体案例中则说明了注意力相关的相关性在模态之间的显著性差异。我们复制了注意力相关活动的个体高度独特的地形的定性结果,这在β波段以及之前研究的慢电位分布[2]中都表现出来。头皮电位和皮质电流分布的视觉检查表明,与已知是感官相关电位主要贡献者的θ和δ波段相比,注意力相关波段的变化很小。定量结果与视觉检查一致,支持这样的结论,即注意力相关的活动在模态之间变化不大,而且无论发生何种个体变化,它们在跨个体的皮质定位中都不是系统性的。我们结合其他呈现个体数据的研究的结果,讨论了我们的结果,这些研究的结果与皮质联合区的功能有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/2caf8a9ac92d/pone.0015022.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/7fd22b75bc4b/pone.0015022.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/8b8f3c94d489/pone.0015022.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/cc7973c37e63/pone.0015022.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/2ff91f52e002/pone.0015022.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/684042241ab2/pone.0015022.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/e93189461baa/pone.0015022.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/6c18004f3015/pone.0015022.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/2caf8a9ac92d/pone.0015022.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/7fd22b75bc4b/pone.0015022.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/8b8f3c94d489/pone.0015022.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/cc7973c37e63/pone.0015022.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/2ff91f52e002/pone.0015022.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/684042241ab2/pone.0015022.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/e93189461baa/pone.0015022.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/6c18004f3015/pone.0015022.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0267/3003700/2caf8a9ac92d/pone.0015022.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Minor and unsystematic cortical topographic changes of attention correlates between modalities.注意跨模态相关的皮质表面小且无系统的拓扑变化。
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 17;5(12):e15022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015022.
2
Interindividual variability in EEG correlates of attention and limits of functional mapping.注意力的脑电图相关性的个体间变异性及功能映射的局限性。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Sep;65(3):238-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 May 10.
3
Individual topographic variability is inherent to cortical physiology but task-related differences may be noise.个体地形变异性是皮质生理学所固有的,但与任务相关的差异可能是噪声。
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0128343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128343. eCollection 2015.
4
Lack of systematic topographic difference between attention and reasoning beta correlates.注意和推理β相关物之间缺乏系统的地形差异。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059595. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
5
Complex, multifocal, individual-specific attention-related cortical functional circuits.复杂的、多灶性的、个体特异性的与注意力相关的皮质功能回路。
Biol Res. 2007;40(4):451-70. Epub 2008 May 28.
6
Complex slow potential generators in a simplified attention paradigm.简化注意范式中的复杂慢电位发生器
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
7
Higher similarity in beta topography between tasks than subjects.任务间的 beta 地形图相似度高于个体间。
Brain Struct Funct. 2018 May;223(4):1627-1635. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1578-9. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Individual versus task differences in slow potential generators.个体与任务差异在慢电位发生器中。
Neurol Sci. 2021 Sep;42(9):3781-3789. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05062-z. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
9
EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions.闭眼和睁眼静息状态下的脑电图差异。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2765-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
10
Spatial correspondence between functional MRI (fMRI) activations and cortical current density maps of event-related potentials (ERP): a study with four tasks.功能磁共振成像(fMRI)激活与事件相关电位(ERP)的皮质电流密度图之间的空间对应关系:一项四项任务的研究。
Brain Topogr. 2008 Dec;21(2):112-27. doi: 10.1007/s10548-008-0064-3. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Ipsilateral EEG mu rhythm reflects the excitability of uncrossed pathways projecting to shoulder muscles.同侧脑电图的μ节律反映了投射到肩部肌肉的未交叉通路的兴奋性。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Aug 25;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12984-017-0294-2.
2
Differential Training Facilitates Early Consolidation in Motor Learning.差异训练有助于运动学习的早期巩固。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct 21;10:199. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00199. eCollection 2016.
3
Time course of EEG oscillations during repeated listening of a well-known aria.在反复聆听一首著名咏叹调期间脑电图振荡的时间进程。

本文引用的文献

1
Large-scale brain networks account for sustained and transient activity during target detection.大规模脑网络在目标检测过程中负责持续和瞬态活动。
Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 1;44(1):265-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.019. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
2
Complex, multifocal, individual-specific attention-related cortical functional circuits.复杂的、多灶性的、个体特异性的与注意力相关的皮质功能回路。
Biol Res. 2007;40(4):451-70. Epub 2008 May 28.
3
Electrophysiological signatures of resting state networks in the human brain.人类大脑静息态网络的电生理特征。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jul 20;9:401. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00401. eCollection 2015.
4
Individual topographic variability is inherent to cortical physiology but task-related differences may be noise.个体地形变异性是皮质生理学所固有的,但与任务相关的差异可能是噪声。
PLoS One. 2015 May 26;10(5):e0128343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128343. eCollection 2015.
5
Lack of systematic topographic difference between attention and reasoning beta correlates.注意和推理β相关物之间缺乏系统的地形差异。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059595. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
6
EEG source imaging during two Qigong meditations.两种气功冥想期间的脑电图源成像。
Cogn Process. 2012 Aug;13(3):255-65. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0441-4. Epub 2012 May 5.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 7;104(32):13170-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700668104. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
4
Interindividual variability in EEG correlates of attention and limits of functional mapping.注意力的脑电图相关性的个体间变异性及功能映射的局限性。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Sep;65(3):238-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 May 10.
5
Detecting subject-specific activations using fuzzy clustering.使用模糊聚类检测个体特异性激活。
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):594-605. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.021. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
6
High frequency oscillations in the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP's) are mainly due to phase-resetting phenomena.体感诱发电位(SSEP)中的高频振荡主要归因于相位重置现象。
J Neurosci Methods. 2006 Jun 30;154(1-2):142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.011. Epub 2006 Feb 2.
7
Alpha phase reset contributes to the generation of ERPs.α 相位重置有助于诱发事件相关电位。
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jan;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj129. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
8
Complex slow potential generators in a simplified attention paradigm.简化注意范式中的复杂慢电位发生器
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.09.004. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
9
Reliability of individual functional MRI brain mapping of language.个体语言功能磁共振成像脑图谱的可靠性。
Neuropsychology. 2005 Jul;19(4):484-93. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.484.
10
Alpha phase synchronization predicts P1 and N1 latency and amplitude size.α 相同步可预测 P1 和 N1 的潜伏期及波幅大小。
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Apr;15(4):371-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh139.