Suppr超能文献

牛特有的临床乳腺炎治疗方法:一种经济方法。

Cow-specific treatment of clinical mastitis: an economic approach.

机构信息

Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3584 CL, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 2011 Jan;94(1):174-88. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3367.

Abstract

Under Dutch circumstances, most clinical mastitis (CM) cases of cows on dairy farms are treated with a standard intramammary antimicrobial treatment. Several antimicrobial treatments are available for CM, differing in antimicrobial compound, route of application, duration, and cost. Because cow factors (e.g., parity, stage of lactation, and somatic cell count history) and the causal pathogen influence the probability of cure, cow-specific treatment of CM is often recommended. The objective of this study was to determine if cow-specific treatment of CM is economically beneficial. Using a stochastic Monte Carlo simulation model, 20,000 CM cases were simulated. These CM cases were caused by Streptococcus uberis and Streptococcus dysgalactiae (40%), Staphylococcus aureus (30%), or Escherichia coli (30%). For each simulated CM case, the consequences of using different antimicrobial treatment regimens (standard 3-d intramammary, extended 5-d intramammary, combination 3-d intramammary+systemic, combination 3-d intramammary+systemic+1-d nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and combination extended 5-d intramammary+systemic) were simulated simultaneously. Finally, total costs of the 5 antimicrobial treatment regimens were compared. Some inputs for the model were based on literature information and assumptions made by the authors were used if no information was available. Bacteriological cure for each individual cow depended on the antimicrobial treatment regimen, the causal pathogen, and the cow factors parity, stage of lactation, somatic cell count history, CM history, and whether the cow was systemically ill. Total costs for each case depended on treatment costs for the initial CM case (including costs for antibiotics, milk withdrawal, and labor), treatment costs for follow-up CM cases, costs for milk production losses, and costs for culling. Average total costs for CM using the 5 treatments were (US) $224, $247, $253, $260, and $275, respectively. Average probabilities of bacteriological cure for the 5 treatments were 0.53, 0.65, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.75, respectively. For all different simulated CM cases, the standard 3-d intramammary antimicrobial treatment had the lowest total costs. The benefits of lower costs for milk production losses and culling for cases treated with the intensive treatments did not outweigh the higher treatment costs. The stochastic model was developed using information from the literature and assumptions made by the authors. Using these information sources resulted in a difference in effectiveness of different antimicrobial treatments for CM. Based on our assumptions, cow-specific treatment of CM was not economically beneficial.

摘要

在荷兰的情况下,大多数奶牛场的临床乳腺炎(CM)病例都采用标准的乳房内抗菌治疗方法进行治疗。有几种抗菌治疗方法可用于 CM,其区别在于抗菌化合物、应用途径、持续时间和成本。由于奶牛因素(例如胎次、泌乳阶段和体细胞计数史)和病原体的因果关系影响治愈率,因此通常建议对 CM 进行基于奶牛的治疗。本研究的目的是确定 CM 的基于奶牛的治疗是否具有经济效益。使用随机蒙特卡罗模拟模型,模拟了 20,000 例 CM 病例。这些 CM 病例是由无乳链球菌和停乳链球菌(40%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(30%)或大肠杆菌(30%)引起的。对于每个模拟的 CM 病例,同时模拟了使用不同抗菌治疗方案(标准 3 天乳房内、延长 5 天乳房内、联合 3 天乳房内+全身、联合 3 天乳房内+全身+1 天非甾体抗炎药和联合延长 5 天乳房内+全身)的后果。最后,比较了 5 种抗菌治疗方案的总费用。该模型的一些输入信息基于文献信息,如果没有信息,则使用作者假设的信息。每个奶牛的细菌学治愈率取决于抗菌治疗方案、病原体以及奶牛因素(胎次、泌乳阶段、体细胞计数史、CM 史和奶牛是否全身性疾病)。每个病例的总费用取决于初始 CM 病例的治疗费用(包括抗生素、牛奶撤回和劳动力费用)、后续 CM 病例的治疗费用、牛奶产量损失费用和淘汰费用。使用 5 种治疗方法的 CM 的平均总成本分别为(美元)224、247、253、260 和 275。5 种治疗方法的平均细菌学治愈率分别为 0.53、0.65、0.65、0.68 和 0.75。对于所有不同的模拟 CM 病例,标准 3 天乳房内抗菌治疗的总成本最低。对于接受强化治疗的病例,较低的牛奶产量损失和淘汰成本的好处并没有超过较高的治疗成本。该随机模型是使用文献信息和作者假设开发的。使用这些信息来源导致 CM 的不同抗菌治疗方法的效果存在差异。根据我们的假设,CM 的基于奶牛的治疗方法没有经济效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验