Regents' Center for Learning Disorders, Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2011 Feb;25(2):302-22. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2010.537280. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
The current investigation identified characteristics that discriminated authentic dyslexia from its simulation using measures common to postsecondary learning disability evaluations. Analyses revealed accurate simulation on most achievement measures but inaccurate feigning on neurolinguistic processing measures, speed on timed tasks, and error quantity. The largest group separations were on rapid naming, speeded orthographic, and reading fluency tasks. Simulators accurately feigned dyslexia profiles on cut-score and discrepancy diagnostic models but not on the more complex aspects of the clinical judgment model. Regarding simulation detection, a multivariate rule exhibited the greatest classification accuracy, followed by univariate indices developed from rapid naming tasks. The findings of the current study suggest that aspects of a comprehensive evaluation may aid in the detection of simulated dyslexia.
本研究旨在利用高等教育学习障碍评估中的常用方法,确定能将真正的阅读障碍与模仿阅读障碍区分开来的特征。分析结果表明,在大多数成就测试中,模仿者能准确地进行模仿,但在神经语言学处理测试、限时任务的速度和错误数量方面的表现却并不准确。最大的分组差异出现在快速命名、快速正字法和阅读流畅性任务上。在切分分数和差异诊断模型上,模仿者能准确地伪造阅读障碍,但在临床判断模型的更复杂方面则无法做到。在模拟检测方面,多元规则表现出了最高的分类准确性,其次是来自快速命名任务的单变量指标。本研究的结果表明,综合评估的各个方面可能有助于检测出模仿阅读障碍。