Suppr超能文献

ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时发生血管造影慢血流/无复流现象的预测因素及长期预后。

Predictors and long-term prognosis of angiographic slow/no-reflow phenomenon during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 2010 Dec;33(12):E7-12. doi: 10.1002/clc.20634.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Angiographic slow/no-reflow during emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may result in unfavorable outcomes. The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical factors and angiographic findings that predict slow/no-reflow phenomenon and the long-term prognosis of AMI patients with angiographic slow/no-reflow.

METHODS

A total of 210 consecutive AMI patients, who underwent primary PCI within 12 hours of symptom onset were divided into a normal flow group (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction [TIMI] flow grade 3, n = 169) and a slow/no-reflow group (≤TIMI flow grade 2, n = 41), based on cineangiograms performed during PCI.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients (19.5%) developed slow/no-reflow phenomenon. Univariate analysis showed that delayed reperfusion, high thrombus burden on baseline angiography, and acute hyperglycemia all correlated with slow/no-reflow (P < 0.05 for all). Multivariate analysis revealed that hyperglycemia on admission (≥10 mmol/L; odds ratio [OR]: 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.423-2.971, P = 0.012), reperfusion time (≥6 h; OR:1.4, 95% CI: 1.193-1.695, P = 0.040), and high thrombus burden (OR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.026-2.825, P = 0.031) were significant and independent predictors of angiographic slow/no-reflow. The 6-month mortality and incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were significantly higher in the slow/no-reflow group than in the normal flow group. Angiographic slow/no-reflow was independently predictive of MACCE (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.642, 95% CI: 1.304-5.932, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Delayed reperfusion, high thrombus burden on baseline angiography, and blood glucose level on admission can be used to stratify AMI patients into a lower or higher risk for angiographic slow/no-reflow during PCI. In addition, angiographic slow/no-reflow predicts an adverse outcome in AMI patients.

摘要

目的

在接受 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死(AMI)的患者中,紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间出现的血管造影慢血流/无复流可能导致不良预后。本研究的目的是探讨预测慢血流/无复流现象的临床因素和血管造影表现,以及 AMI 患者血管造影慢血流/无复流的长期预后。

方法

210 例 AMI 患者在症状发作后 12 小时内接受了直接 PCI,根据 PCI 期间进行的电影血管造影,将其分为正常血流组(血栓溶解心肌梗死 [TIMI] 血流分级 3 级,n=169)和慢血流/无复流组(≤TIMI 血流分级 2 级,n=41)。

结果

共有 41 例患者(19.5%)出现慢血流/无复流现象。单因素分析显示,延迟再灌注、基线血管造影时的高血栓负荷以及急性高血糖均与慢血流/无复流相关(所有 P<0.05)。多因素分析显示,入院时高血糖(≥10mmol/L;优势比 [OR]:1.7,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.423-2.971,P=0.012)、再灌注时间(≥6 小时;OR:1.4,95%CI:1.193-1.695,P=0.040)和高血栓负荷(OR:1.6,95%CI:1.026-2.825,P=0.031)是血管造影慢血流/无复流的显著且独立预测因素。慢血流/无复流组 6 个月死亡率和主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)发生率明显高于正常血流组。血管造影慢血流/无复流与 MACCE 独立相关(危险比 [HR]:2.642,95%CI:1.304-5.932,P=0.028)。

结论

延迟再灌注、基线血管造影时的高血栓负荷和入院时的血糖水平可用于对 AMI 患者进行分层,以预测 PCI 期间发生血管造影慢血流/无复流的风险较高或较低。此外,血管造影慢血流/无复流预测 AMI 患者的不良预后。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Coronary microembolization.冠状动脉微栓塞
Circ J. 2003 Apr;67(4):279-86. doi: 10.1253/circj.67.279.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验